Developing the Urban Diversity Index (UDI): A Global Comparison of Urban Qualitative Aspect and Its Implications for Sustainable Urban Planning Using POI Data

Understanding urban diversity is critical to inclusive planning for sustainable urban development. This study introduces a new Urban Diversity Index (UDI) based on global point-of-interest (POI) data for food-related establishments—defined here as facilities that offer food and beverage services, including various kinds of eating and drinking venues —covering 249 cities across 154 countries. The UDI integrates three components: Pielou’s Evenness Index (J′) to capture the balance of establishment types, a Coverage Ratio (C′) to measure global representativeness of establishment categories, and density (ρ′) to reflect spatial concentration. By applying concentric buffer analysis around city centers, we evaluate the spatial profiles of diversity in each city. Results show that while cities like London and Istanbul have similar index components, they exhibit significant differences in the spatial extent and pattern of high-diversity zones, reflecting their unique morphological and regulatory contexts. Furthermore, the analysis of “Peak Distance Buffer Zones”—areas where UDI remains above 95% of its maximum—reveals diverse urban forms, particularly in Asian megacities. Scatterplots of standardized UDI and peak distances identify distinct typologies of urban diversity structures. Notably, urban population size showed no significant correlation with UDI values. Overall, this study demonstrates the utility of globally standardized POI-based metrics in capturing the spatial heterogeneity of urban qualitative diversity and offers new insights into cross-city comparisons of urban complexity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167286
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing the Urban Diversity Index (UDI): A Global Comparison of Urban Qualitative Aspect and Its Implications for Sustainable Urban Planning Using POI Data

Takahito Shimizu, Yuki Akiyama, Keisuke Mizutani, Chiaki Mizutani Akiyama
1 citations
Sustainability
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
4.20
article

Developing the Urban Diversity Index (UDI): A Global Comparison of Urban Qualitative Aspect and Its Implications for Sustainable Urban Planning Using POI Data

Takahito Shimizu, Yuki Akiyama, Keisuke Mizutani, Chiaki Mizutani Akiyama
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Understanding urban diversity is critical to inclusive planning for sustainable urban development. This study introduces a new Urban Diversity Index (UDI) based on global point-of-interest (POI) data for food-related establishments—defined here as facilities that offer food and beverage services, including various kinds of eating and drinking venues —covering 249 cities across 154 countries. The UDI integrates three components: Pielou’s Evenness Index (J′) to capture the balance of establishment types, a Coverage Ratio (C′) to measure global representativeness of establishment categories, and density (ρ′) to reflect spatial concentration. By applying concentric buffer analysis around city centers, we evaluate the spatial profiles of diversity in each city. Results show that while cities like London and Istanbul have similar index components, they exhibit significant differences in the spatial extent and pattern of high-diversity zones, reflecting their unique morphological and regulatory contexts. Furthermore, the analysis of “Peak Distance Buffer Zones”—areas where UDI remains above 95% of its maximum—reveals diverse urban forms, particularly in Asian megacities. Scatterplots of standardized UDI and peak distances identify distinct typologies of urban diversity structures. Notably, urban population size showed no significant correlation with UDI values. Overall, this study demonstrates the utility of globally standardized POI-based metrics in capturing the spatial heterogeneity of urban qualitative diversity and offers new insights into cross-city comparisons of urban complexity.

SustainabilityVol. 17(16)
Tokyo City University (JP), Reitaku University (JP), Institute of Urban and Regional Development (PL)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.