Performance of the Global-Local modelling approach for FT-NIR predictions of SOC and TN in diverse Saskatchewan agricultural soils

• Global-Local models performed better than Global for predicting SOC and TN. • Site-Specific models outperformed all other models evaluated. • Global-Local model performed similar to the best Lab or Neighbour model. • Spiking performed as well as or better than the Global-Local model, depending on the site. • Inclusion of site-specific samples improved model performance. Precision agriculture requires a reliable, cost-effective method to measure soil organic carbon (SOC) and total nitrogen (TN), and Fourier Transform Near Infrared (FT-NIR) spectroscopy offers a promising solution. Here, we applied the Global-Local model to improve FT-NIR SOC and TN predictions in Saskatchewan agricultural soils. Soil samples (SOC: n = 1876; TN: n = 1442) were collected in 2020 and 2021 from six Saskatchewan agricultural regions. Spectral data were acquired, preprocessed using continuous wavelet transform (CWT), and modelled using Cubist regression. The Global-Local model was applied by combining a small subset of site-specific samples ( Lab ) with their k -nearest neighbours ( Neighbour ) from Saskatchewan spectral datasets. Its performance was compared with Leave-One-Site-Out ( LOSOV ), site-specific, Lab , Neighbour , and traditional spiking. Compared to LOSOV (SOC: R 2 = 0.55 – 0.76, CCC = 0.67 – 0.79, RPD = 1.20 – 1.44), site-specific models gave higher performance (SOC: R 2 = 0.71 – 0.88, CCC = 0.82 – 0.92; RPD = 1.59 – 2.70). The Global-Local model performed better than LOSOV and performed similarly to the best Lab or Neighbour models. Compared to the Global-Local , traditional spiking either improved or gave similar results due to higher variability in target variable and spectra datasets. The more accurate models using either spiking or Global-Local than LOSOV confirms the importance of incorporating site-specific samples into training datasets. Our results indicate that the application of the Global-Local model should be restricted to an individual field level, which was its original purpose. Future studies on optimization of the Global-Local model is needed to scale-up its application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoderma
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2025.117477
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance of the Global-Local modelling approach for FT-NIR predictions of SOC and TN in diverse Saskatchewan agricultural soils

David Bulmer, Preston Sorenson, Derek Peak, Mervin St. Luce et al.
1 citations
Geoderma
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
0.80
article

Performance of the Global-Local modelling approach for FT-NIR predictions of SOC and TN in diverse Saskatchewan agricultural soils

David Bulmer, Preston Sorenson, Derek Peak, Mervin St. Luce, Gbenga Daniel ADEJUMO
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Global-Local models performed better than Global for predicting SOC and TN. • Site-Specific models outperformed all other models evaluated. • Global-Local model performed similar to the best Lab or Neighbour model. • Spiking performed as well as or better than the Global-Local model, depending on the site. • Inclusion of site-specific samples improved model performance. Precision agriculture requires a reliable, cost-effective method to measure soil organic carbon (SOC) and total nitrogen (TN), and Fourier Transform Near Infrared (FT-NIR) spectroscopy offers a promising solution. Here, we applied the Global-Local model to improve FT-NIR SOC and TN predictions in Saskatchewan agricultural soils. Soil samples (SOC: n = 1876; TN: n = 1442) were collected in 2020 and 2021 from six Saskatchewan agricultural regions. Spectral data were acquired, preprocessed using continuous wavelet transform (CWT), and modelled using Cubist regression. The Global-Local model was applied by combining a small subset of site-specific samples ( Lab ) with their k -nearest neighbours ( Neighbour ) from Saskatchewan spectral datasets. Its performance was compared with Leave-One-Site-Out ( LOSOV ), site-specific, Lab , Neighbour , and traditional spiking. Compared to LOSOV (SOC: R 2 = 0.55 – 0.76, CCC = 0.67 – 0.79, RPD = 1.20 – 1.44), site-specific models gave higher performance (SOC: R 2 = 0.71 – 0.88, CCC = 0.82 – 0.92; RPD = 1.59 – 2.70). The Global-Local model performed better than LOSOV and performed similarly to the best Lab or Neighbour models. Compared to the Global-Local , traditional spiking either improved or gave similar results due to higher variability in target variable and spectra datasets. The more accurate models using either spiking or Global-Local than LOSOV confirms the importance of incorporating site-specific samples into training datasets. Our results indicate that the application of the Global-Local model should be restricted to an individual field level, which was its original purpose. Future studies on optimization of the Global-Local model is needed to scale-up its application.

GeodermaVol. 461
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (CA), University of Saskatchewan (CA)
Ministry of Agriculture - Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan Canola Development Commission, Saskatchewan Wheat Development Commission
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.