Performance of the Global-Local modelling approach for FT-NIR predictions of SOC and TN in diverse Saskatchewan agricultural soils
• Global-Local models performed better than Global for predicting SOC and TN. • Site-Specific models outperformed all other models evaluated. • Global-Local model performed similar to the best Lab or Neighbour model. • Spiking performed as well as or better than the Global-Local model, depending on the site. • Inclusion of site-specific samples improved model performance. Precision agriculture requires a reliable, cost-effective method to measure soil organic carbon (SOC) and total nitrogen (TN), and Fourier Transform Near Infrared (FT-NIR) spectroscopy offers a promising solution. Here, we applied the Global-Local model to improve FT-NIR SOC and TN predictions in Saskatchewan agricultural soils. Soil samples (SOC: n = 1876; TN: n = 1442) were collected in 2020 and 2021 from six Saskatchewan agricultural regions. Spectral data were acquired, preprocessed using continuous wavelet transform (CWT), and modelled using Cubist regression. The Global-Local model was applied by combining a small subset of site-specific samples ( Lab ) with their k -nearest neighbours ( Neighbour ) from Saskatchewan spectral datasets. Its performance was compared with Leave-One-Site-Out ( LOSOV ), site-specific, Lab , Neighbour , and traditional spiking. Compared to LOSOV (SOC: R 2 = 0.55 – 0.76, CCC = 0.67 – 0.79, RPD = 1.20 – 1.44), site-specific models gave higher performance (SOC: R 2 = 0.71 – 0.88, CCC = 0.82 – 0.92; RPD = 1.59 – 2.70). The Global-Local model performed better than LOSOV and performed similarly to the best Lab or Neighbour models. Compared to the Global-Local , traditional spiking either improved or gave similar results due to higher variability in target variable and spectra datasets. The more accurate models using either spiking or Global-Local than LOSOV confirms the importance of incorporating site-specific samples into training datasets. Our results indicate that the application of the Global-Local model should be restricted to an individual field level, which was its original purpose. Future studies on optimization of the Global-Local model is needed to scale-up its application.
Authors
- David Bulmer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3500-3853)
- Preston Sorenson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2958-1246)
- Derek Peak (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8876-3605)
- Mervin St. Luce (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2805-9587)
- Gbenga Daniel ADEJUMO (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4879-7712)
Institutions
- Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (CA)
- University of Saskatchewan (CA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Geoderma
- Published
- 2025-08-11
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2025.117477
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.80
Funders
- Ministry of Agriculture - Saskatchewan
- Saskatchewan Canola Development Commission
- Saskatchewan Wheat Development Commission