Comparing Juvenile Physiology and Morphology of Two High-Elevation Pines, Pinus albicaulis and P. balfouriana

Abstract Whitebark pine ( Pinus albicaulis , PIAL) and foxtail pine ( P. balfouriana , PIBA) are slow-growing, high-elevation, five-needled pines. Recently, PIAL has experienced significant mortality while PIBA has experienced minimal decline. PIBA exists in two disjunct southern (PIBA S ) and northern (PIBA N ) populations. Our study compared juvenile physiological and morphological traits between the two species (PIAL, PIBA) and foxtail populations (PIBA N , PIBA S ) to investigate mechanisms underlying responses to environmental stressors in their high-elevation environments. We grew four-year-old PIAL and PIBA trees in a common greenhouse environment. We measured traits describing their morphology, biomass, stomatal and xylem conduit size and density, budburst phenology, gas exchange, whole plant volatile organic compounds (VOCs), phloem volatile resin (PVR) compounds, and non-structural carbohydrates (NSC). We found that PIAL and PIBA displayed different suites of traits that similarly promote resistance to environmental stressors ( e.g., high wind, drought, herbivores). The two PIBA populations did not differ in most traits except for VOCs where PIBA S emitted higher concentrations of specific and total whole plant VOCs than PIBA N , suggesting that PIBA S may differ in susceptibility to stress from PIBA N . For many traits and especially evident in whole plant VOC concentration and composition, PIAL and PIBA N were most similar while PIAL and PIBA S differed the most, consistent with growing season total precipitation of the juveniles’ climates of origin. Our observed trait differences between species and populations offer insight into mechanisms by which PIAL and PIBA juveniles survive in their environments, improving our ability to understand drivers of current and future species distributions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forest Science
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44391-025-00040-w
Primary Topic
Forest ecology and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Juvenile Physiology and Morphology of Two High-Elevation Pines, Pinus albicaulis and P. balfouriana

Justin B. Runyon, Franklin Alongi, Katharine M. Banner, Brian V. Smithers et al.
Forest Science
Forest ecology and management
article

Comparing Juvenile Physiology and Morphology of Two High-Elevation Pines, Pinus albicaulis and P. balfouriana

Justin B. Runyon, Franklin Alongi, Katharine M. Banner, Brian V. Smithers, Sean Hoy‐Skubik, Danielle E. M. Ulrich, Kenneth Sparks
article en

Abstract

Abstract Whitebark pine ( Pinus albicaulis , PIAL) and foxtail pine ( P. balfouriana , PIBA) are slow-growing, high-elevation, five-needled pines. Recently, PIAL has experienced significant mortality while PIBA has experienced minimal decline. PIBA exists in two disjunct southern (PIBA S ) and northern (PIBA N ) populations. Our study compared juvenile physiological and morphological traits between the two species (PIAL, PIBA) and foxtail populations (PIBA N , PIBA S ) to investigate mechanisms underlying responses to environmental stressors in their high-elevation environments. We grew four-year-old PIAL and PIBA trees in a common greenhouse environment. We measured traits describing their morphology, biomass, stomatal and xylem conduit size and density, budburst phenology, gas exchange, whole plant volatile organic compounds (VOCs), phloem volatile resin (PVR) compounds, and non-structural carbohydrates (NSC). We found that PIAL and PIBA displayed different suites of traits that similarly promote resistance to environmental stressors ( e.g., high wind, drought, herbivores). The two PIBA populations did not differ in most traits except for VOCs where PIBA S emitted higher concentrations of specific and total whole plant VOCs than PIBA N , suggesting that PIBA S may differ in susceptibility to stress from PIBA N . For many traits and especially evident in whole plant VOC concentration and composition, PIAL and PIBA N were most similar while PIAL and PIBA S differed the most, consistent with growing season total precipitation of the juveniles’ climates of origin. Our observed trait differences between species and populations offer insight into mechanisms by which PIAL and PIBA juveniles survive in their environments, improving our ability to understand drivers of current and future species distributions.

Forest ScienceVol. 71(6)
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE), US Forest Service (US), Montana State University (US), Rocky Mountain Research Station (US), Rocky Mountain Research (United States) (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Montana State University, U.S. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Forest ecology and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.