Risks Associated with the Abolition of Restrictions on Individuals Holding the Position of Head of a Constituent Entity of the Russian Federation for More than Two Consecutive Terms

The paper addresses the issue of abolishing the limitation on the number of consecutive terms that an individual may serve as the head of a constituent entity of the Russian Federation. It is noted that the Constitution does not impose an obligation on lawmakers to establish such limitations. Moreover, such restrictions are constitutionally defined only for the Head of State. Considering the recent changes in Russian legislation — specifically the repeal of limits on holding the office of the head of a constituent entity for more than two consecutive terms — if the populace is satisfied with the performance of the regional head, they may opt to re-elect this individual for a third term or even longer. The paper highlights potential risks associated with a low level of legal consciousness among the regional population and their desire for stability, which could lead to the consolidation of power for an extended period, not only in the hands of a single individual but also within a group, as the head of a constituent entity plays a role in forming the highest executive body of that constituent entity. The author draws the conclusion that limiting the number of terms for the head of a constituent entity is an essential measure aimed at safeguarding democratic principles and preventing the abuse of power. Hence, this regulation should be reinstated in Russian legislation, despite potential arguments advocating for its abolition. This necessity arises from the fact that the current formulation of this norm does not align with the constitutional principle of the rotation of power, as articulated in Articles 1 and 3 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation.