How Should We Interpret “Abnormal” Lab Results in Older Patients? Ethical and Practical Challenges of Establishing and Verifying Laboratory Reference Intervals in the United States

Laboratory reference intervals (RIs) are useful tools that assist healthcare workers with medical decision-making. With current laboratory establishment and verification techniques, older patients can be systematically excluded from the RI process. This in turn can lead to use of improper RIs that may not accurately reflect the normal physiologic variance of aging. Ethically, the use of improper RIs in older patients conflicts with the principles of justice and beneficence. By excluding older patients from laboratory RIs, any effects in this population's healthcare outcomes would reflect the intrinsic ageist structure of the current RI system. Ways to address this issue include active inclusion of older patients in establishment studies, or establishment of population specific RIs, though each solution has limitations. Use of artificial intelligence and informatics techniques also could prove useful in this endeavor. It is critical that healthcare providers understand these challenges when treating this population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sage Open Aging
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/30495334251365604
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Should We Interpret “Abnormal” Lab Results in Older Patients? Ethical and Practical Challenges of Establishing and Verifying Laboratory Reference Intervals in the United States

Cullen M. Lilley, Kamran Mirza, Alex P. Tannenbaum
Sage Open Aging
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

How Should We Interpret “Abnormal” Lab Results in Older Patients? Ethical and Practical Challenges of Establishing and Verifying Laboratory Reference Intervals in the United States

Cullen M. Lilley, Kamran Mirza, Alex P. Tannenbaum
article en

Abstract

Laboratory reference intervals (RIs) are useful tools that assist healthcare workers with medical decision-making. With current laboratory establishment and verification techniques, older patients can be systematically excluded from the RI process. This in turn can lead to use of improper RIs that may not accurately reflect the normal physiologic variance of aging. Ethically, the use of improper RIs in older patients conflicts with the principles of justice and beneficence. By excluding older patients from laboratory RIs, any effects in this population's healthcare outcomes would reflect the intrinsic ageist structure of the current RI system. Ways to address this issue include active inclusion of older patients in establishment studies, or establishment of population specific RIs, though each solution has limitations. Use of artificial intelligence and informatics techniques also could prove useful in this endeavor. It is critical that healthcare providers understand these challenges when treating this population.

Sage Open AgingVol. 11
University of Michigan (US), UCLA Health (US), UW Health University Hospital (US), Michigan Medicine (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How Should We Interpret “Abnormal” Lab Results in Older Patients? Ethical and Practical Challenges of Establishing and Verifying Laboratory Reference Intervals in the United States — Cullen M. Lilley, Kamran Mirza, et al. · Sage Open Aging (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS