Assessing mentalization in practice: Reliability of the mentalization‐based treatment research adherence and competence scale
These findings suggest that the MBT-RACS's format, which emphasizes broader, clinically meaningful domains, may contribute to improved consistency in ratings. The scale's robust reliability supports its applicability in research and clinical supervision, enhancing methodological rigour, quality assurance and targeted feedback for effective MBT training and implementation.
Authors
- Peter Fonagy (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0229-0091)
- Karen Yirmiya (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7580-3957)
- Anthony Bateman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1137-4609)
- Sophie Marjoribanks
Institutions
- Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
- Anna Freud Centre (GB)
- University College London (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- British Journal of Clinical Psychology
- Published
- 2025-08-10
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.70010
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.31