Conducting Atomic Force Microscopy of Protein Wires

Scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) studies have shown that protein wires based on the consensus tetratricopetide repeat (CTPR) conduct with an electrical resistance proportional to length of the protein, consistent with long-range hopping transport along the long axis of the protein. However, the attempts to measure similar currents across proteins mounted in fixed-gap devices have not been successful. Here, the study reports conducting atomic force microscopy studies of CTPR8 and CTPR4, ≈8 and 4 nm in length, finding that substantial contact force (>50 nN) is required to observe conduction in CTPR8. Scrape-tests indicate that the probe penetrates the film by ≈1 nm at this force. Importantly, electrical contacts that resemble the STM data are rare-approximately 1% of all contacts. STM reports only successful contacts, so it does not predict statistically how the proteins will behave in a fixed junction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Small
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202505452
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conducting Atomic Force Microscopy of Protein Wires

Brian Ashcroft, Stuart Lindsay
1 citations
Small
Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
1.25
article

Conducting Atomic Force Microscopy of Protein Wires

Brian Ashcroft, Stuart Lindsay
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) studies have shown that protein wires based on the consensus tetratricopetide repeat (CTPR) conduct with an electrical resistance proportional to length of the protein, consistent with long-range hopping transport along the long axis of the protein. However, the attempts to measure similar currents across proteins mounted in fixed-gap devices have not been successful. Here, the study reports conducting atomic force microscopy studies of CTPR8 and CTPR4, ≈8 and 4 nm in length, finding that substantial contact force (>50 nN) is required to observe conduction in CTPR8. Scrape-tests indicate that the probe penetrates the film by ≈1 nm at this force. Importantly, electrical contacts that resemble the STM data are rare-approximately 1% of all contacts. STM reports only successful contacts, so it does not predict statistically how the proteins will behave in a fixed junction.

SmallVol. 21(39)
Arizona State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
1.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Conducting Atomic Force Microscopy of Protein Wires — Brian Ashcroft, Stuart Lindsay · Small (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS