Advancing Genotoxicity Assessment by Building a Global <scp>AOP</scp> Network

Current genotoxicity testing strategies face several challenges, including a high incidence of misleading positive results that lead to unnecessary animal testing, limited mechanistic insights, insufficient integration of innovative methodologies, and a lack of quantitative assessment. Despite rapid advancements in technology and scientific understanding, genotoxicity testing batteries have remained largely unchanged for years. To modernize genotoxicity assessment and incorporate innovative approaches, the development of Integrated Approaches for Testing and Assessment (IATAs) is essential. These frameworks combine existing knowledge with data from New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) aiming to reduce or eliminate reliance on in vivo testing. Genotoxicity is particularly well-suited for IATA development as numerous cutting-edge, non-animal methods have emerged in recent years, including 3D test systems, Prediscreen, MultiFlow, ToxTracker, and transcriptomic-based biomarkers such as GENOMARK and TGx-DDI. However, the integration of NAMs into IATAs must be systematic and scientifically robust. In this process, the Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) framework plays a crucial role by linking molecular-level events to adverse health effects, thereby supporting the structured selection of NAMs. This article explores the key challenges and gaps within the current European regulatory frameworks for chemical compound genotoxicity assessment and discusses how an AOP-based IATA can address these issues. Additionally, we present a global AOP network for permanent DNA damage, designed to guide IATA development and improve regulatory decision-making. This integrated approach has the potential to enhance the accuracy, efficiency, and ethical standards of genotoxicity assessment while reducing reliance on animal testing.