Accuracy and repeatability of autorefraction in young adults: a comparison of cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic methods

A clinically significant difference was observed between non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic autorefraction in young adult participants, particularly among hyperopes. Cycloplegic measurements showed better repeatability, supporting their use for accurate refraction. Further research is needed on potential enhancing effects of proxymetacaine hydrochloride, particularly in diverse populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical and Experimental Optometry
Published
2025-08-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/08164622.2025.2542321
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accuracy and repeatability of autorefraction in young adults: a comparison of cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic methods

Megan Doyle, Veronica O’Dwyer, Síofra Harrington, Michael Moore
2 citations
Clinical and Experimental Optometry
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
2.71
article

Accuracy and repeatability of autorefraction in young adults: a comparison of cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic methods

Megan Doyle, Veronica O’Dwyer, Síofra Harrington, Michael Moore
article en
2 citations

Abstract

A clinically significant difference was observed between non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic autorefraction in young adult participants, particularly among hyperopes. Cycloplegic measurements showed better repeatability, supporting their use for accurate refraction. Further research is needed on potential enhancing effects of proxymetacaine hydrochloride, particularly in diverse populations.

Clinical and Experimental Optometry
Technological University Dublin (IE)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
2.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.