Contraceptive care and method use by sexual and gender minority status: insights from a longitudinal panel of sexual and reproductive healthcare patients in Wisconsin

Access to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) care is key for people to realise their reproductive goals, but sexual and gender minority (SGM) patients may experience different barriers or facilitators to access than their non-SGM counterparts. We analysed a panel dataset of 900 patients using publicly funded SRH services in Wisconsin in 2020-2023 and constructed conditional logistic regression models to explore barriers to contraceptive services and subsequent patient-centred contraceptive method use, stratified by SGM status. Experience of barriers to wanted contraception was strongly related to preferred contraceptive use (aOR = 0.36, CI: 0.20-0.64, <i>p</i> = 0.002) and method satisfaction (aOR = 0.39, CI: 0.20-0.77, <i>p</i> = 0.010). Barriers were also linked to lower use of LARC methods by patients preferring LARC methods, including affordability barriers (aOR = 0.09, CI: 0.01-0.85, <i>p</i> = 0.037). SGM patients were less likely to report preferred method use (aOR = 0.18, CI: 0.08-0.42, <i>p</i> = 0.001) and method satisfaction (aOR = 0.30, CI: 0.11-0.81, <i>p</i> = 0.022) after experiencing barriers. Those who experienced affordability barriers were also less likely to report preferred method use (aOR = 0.18, CI: 0.05-0.68, <i>p</i> = 0.015). For non-SGM patients, only experiencing a missed healthcare visit was related to lower method satisfaction (aOR = 0.48, CI: 0.25-0.92, <i>p</i> = 0.029). Our study highlights that barriers to contraceptive care can hamper people's ability to realise their contraceptive preferences. Furthermore, our differential findings by SGM status point to potential gaps in healthcare systems that are not adequately set up to serve all patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2025.2544432
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contraceptive care and method use by sexual and gender minority status: insights from a longitudinal panel of sexual and reproductive healthcare patients in Wisconsin

Megan L. Kavanaugh, Ellie Leong, Fiona Weeks, Christina E. Geddes
Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters
Reproductive Health and Contraception
article

Contraceptive care and method use by sexual and gender minority status: insights from a longitudinal panel of sexual and reproductive healthcare patients in Wisconsin

Megan L. Kavanaugh, Ellie Leong, Fiona Weeks, Christina E. Geddes
article en

Abstract

Access to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) care is key for people to realise their reproductive goals, but sexual and gender minority (SGM) patients may experience different barriers or facilitators to access than their non-SGM counterparts. We analysed a panel dataset of 900 patients using publicly funded SRH services in Wisconsin in 2020-2023 and constructed conditional logistic regression models to explore barriers to contraceptive services and subsequent patient-centred contraceptive method use, stratified by SGM status. Experience of barriers to wanted contraception was strongly related to preferred contraceptive use (aOR = 0.36, CI: 0.20-0.64, <i>p</i> = 0.002) and method satisfaction (aOR = 0.39, CI: 0.20-0.77, <i>p</i> = 0.010). Barriers were also linked to lower use of LARC methods by patients preferring LARC methods, including affordability barriers (aOR = 0.09, CI: 0.01-0.85, <i>p</i> = 0.037). SGM patients were less likely to report preferred method use (aOR = 0.18, CI: 0.08-0.42, <i>p</i> = 0.001) and method satisfaction (aOR = 0.30, CI: 0.11-0.81, <i>p</i> = 0.022) after experiencing barriers. Those who experienced affordability barriers were also less likely to report preferred method use (aOR = 0.18, CI: 0.05-0.68, <i>p</i> = 0.015). For non-SGM patients, only experiencing a missed healthcare visit was related to lower method satisfaction (aOR = 0.48, CI: 0.25-0.92, <i>p</i> = 0.029). Our study highlights that barriers to contraceptive care can hamper people's ability to realise their contraceptive preferences. Furthermore, our differential findings by SGM status point to potential gaps in healthcare systems that are not adequately set up to serve all patients.

Sexual and Reproductive Health MattersVol. 33(1)
Guttmacher Institute (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
William and Flora Hewlett Foundation
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.