Assessment of Worldwide Bronchoscopy Practices and Training Methods: A WABIP Survey

The practice of bronchoscopy is not standardized. Regional and global variations in bronchoscopy practice are exacerbated by the paucity of recommendations regarding technical aspects in major bronchoscopy guidelines. The aim of this survey was to examine the prevalent practices, adherence to guidelines, and training requirements of bronchoscopy in different countries. The Membership Committee and the Education Committee of the World Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology designed an online survey that was sent to 1,300 consultant physicians in adult respiratory medicine from 64 countries across five continents. The questionnaire included questions regarding bronchoscopy practice. We obtained 879 responses (67.0%). In 81.2% of cases, the practice occurred in cities with over 200,000 inhabitants. The median number of years in practice was 14 (range 1-50). Only 11% of respondents perform routine bronchoscopy without anesthesia. Spirometry was always performed before bronchoscopy by only 106 physicians (12.4%), blood coagulation tests were always required by 533 (60.6%) and an electrocardiography was always required by 339 (38.5%). The main indications for performing a bronchoscopy were suspicion of cancer (78.6%), suspicion of non tuberculosis (TB) infection (10.6%), and suspicion of TB (6.7%). 39.3% of responders received formal training for at least 6 months with a formal certificate. Despite the wide availability of bronchoscopy guidelines, the way to do them in terms of preparation, anesthesia, technical aspects, etc., varies greatly in each country and physician.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Thoracic research and practice
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4274/thoracrespract.2025.2025-3-1
Primary Topic
Tracheal and airway disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Worldwide Bronchoscopy Practices and Training Methods: A WABIP Survey

Agustín Buero, Stefano Gasperini, Sílvia Quadrelli
Thoracic research and practice
Tracheal and airway disorders
article

Assessment of Worldwide Bronchoscopy Practices and Training Methods: A WABIP Survey

Agustín Buero, Stefano Gasperini, Sílvia Quadrelli
article en

Abstract

The practice of bronchoscopy is not standardized. Regional and global variations in bronchoscopy practice are exacerbated by the paucity of recommendations regarding technical aspects in major bronchoscopy guidelines. The aim of this survey was to examine the prevalent practices, adherence to guidelines, and training requirements of bronchoscopy in different countries. The Membership Committee and the Education Committee of the World Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology designed an online survey that was sent to 1,300 consultant physicians in adult respiratory medicine from 64 countries across five continents. The questionnaire included questions regarding bronchoscopy practice. We obtained 879 responses (67.0%). In 81.2% of cases, the practice occurred in cities with over 200,000 inhabitants. The median number of years in practice was 14 (range 1-50). Only 11% of respondents perform routine bronchoscopy without anesthesia. Spirometry was always performed before bronchoscopy by only 106 physicians (12.4%), blood coagulation tests were always required by 533 (60.6%) and an electrocardiography was always required by 339 (38.5%). The main indications for performing a bronchoscopy were suspicion of cancer (78.6%), suspicion of non tuberculosis (TB) infection (10.6%), and suspicion of TB (6.7%). 39.3% of responders received formal training for at least 6 months with a formal certificate. Despite the wide availability of bronchoscopy guidelines, the way to do them in terms of preparation, anesthesia, technical aspects, etc., varies greatly in each country and physician.

Thoracic research and practiceVol. 26(6)
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT), San Raffaele University of Rome (IT), Hospital Alemán (AR), Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires (AR)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Tracheal and airway disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.