Students’ Perception of Traditional and Online Laboratories toward Academic Achievement in Biology

The study examined how third-year Biology students at Don Carlos Polytechnic College perceive traditional and online laboratories, and whether these perceptions are related to their academic achievement. Sixty students participated, and researchers employed statistical methods, including mean analysis and correlation coefficients, to gather insights. The findings revealed that students strongly preferred traditional laboratories, rating them highly for their positive impact on learning, engagement, and satisfaction. Students felt that these labs not only enhanced their performance and critical thinking but also provided interactive and enjoyable experiences that boosted their confidence. While online laboratories were also viewed positively—particularly for encouraging independent learning and offering flexibility—students expressed a stronger emotional connection to traditional lab environments. Academically, most students performed well, with the majority receiving grades in the “Very Good” range, and a few achieving “Excellent” or “Good.” Overall, the class demonstrated strong academic performance with room for improvement. Finally, correlation analysis revealed no statistically significant relationship between students’ perceptions of either traditional or online laboratories and their academic achievement. The correlation coefficients and p-values for online (r=−0.126, p=0.334) and traditional labs (r=0.004, p=0.974) indicated weak and insignificant relationships. Based on the results, the study showed no significant relationship and failed to accept the alternative hypothesis.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51584/ijrias.2025.100700016
Primary Topic
Problem and Project Based Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Students’ Perception of Traditional and Online Laboratories toward Academic Achievement in Biology

Jhen Rose A. Samosino, Ellen Joy F. Bugawan, Reyan Jen B. Amper, Irene C. Armenton et al.
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science
Problem and Project Based Learning
article

Students’ Perception of Traditional and Online Laboratories toward Academic Achievement in Biology

Jhen Rose A. Samosino, Ellen Joy F. Bugawan, Reyan Jen B. Amper, Irene C. Armenton, Jezza S. Alicante
article en

Abstract

The study examined how third-year Biology students at Don Carlos Polytechnic College perceive traditional and online laboratories, and whether these perceptions are related to their academic achievement. Sixty students participated, and researchers employed statistical methods, including mean analysis and correlation coefficients, to gather insights. The findings revealed that students strongly preferred traditional laboratories, rating them highly for their positive impact on learning, engagement, and satisfaction. Students felt that these labs not only enhanced their performance and critical thinking but also provided interactive and enjoyable experiences that boosted their confidence. While online laboratories were also viewed positively—particularly for encouraging independent learning and offering flexibility—students expressed a stronger emotional connection to traditional lab environments. Academically, most students performed well, with the majority receiving grades in the “Very Good” range, and a few achieving “Excellent” or “Good.” Overall, the class demonstrated strong academic performance with room for improvement. Finally, correlation analysis revealed no statistically significant relationship between students’ perceptions of either traditional or online laboratories and their academic achievement. The correlation coefficients and p-values for online (r=−0.126, p=0.334) and traditional labs (r=0.004, p=0.974) indicated weak and insignificant relationships. Based on the results, the study showed no significant relationship and failed to accept the alternative hypothesis.

International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied ScienceVol. X(VII)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Problem and Project Based Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.