Advanced Brain Tumor Classification: A Comparative Study of CNN, EfficientNetB3, and XceptionNet Architectures

Brain tumor-which is a segment of a severe health problem-is one of the most heterogeneous pathologies in whose tumor structure the complexity itself hinders the diagnosis and treatment. The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of several deep learning models, namely CNN, EfficientNetB3, and XceptionNet, on brain tumor type classification such as Glioma, Meningioma, Notumor, and Pituitary. In the current study, 7,023 MRI scans were utilized that were publicly available, preprocessed, and divided into training, validation, and test sets. All of them are fine-tuned and trained for optimum performance, where the performance metrics of accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score were adapted to ascertain their efficiency. EfficientNetB3 topped the ranking list among all the used models, where it attained an accuracy of 98% in all tumor classes; hence, this model proved to be reliable. XceptionNet and CNN did quite well, where both achieved 97% and 95%, respectively, but both suffer in accurately classifying Meningioma cases. These findings then suggest that EfficientNetB3 is particularly predisposed to brain tumor classification. This study shall, therefore, bring forth the value of a number of deep learning models with large dimensions for enabling accurate and timely detection of brain tumors to improve outcomes for patients. Future studies may seek to explore the integration of such tools with explainable AI for further improvements in clinical applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ariia63345.2024.11051888
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advanced Brain Tumor Classification: A Comparative Study of CNN, EfficientNetB3, and XceptionNet Architectures

Vinay Kukreja, Abhinav Rathour, Pratham Kaushik, Jahnavi Bansal
1 citations
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
0.25
article

Advanced Brain Tumor Classification: A Comparative Study of CNN, EfficientNetB3, and XceptionNet Architectures

Vinay Kukreja, Abhinav Rathour, Pratham Kaushik, Jahnavi Bansal
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Brain tumor-which is a segment of a severe health problem-is one of the most heterogeneous pathologies in whose tumor structure the complexity itself hinders the diagnosis and treatment. The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of several deep learning models, namely CNN, EfficientNetB3, and XceptionNet, on brain tumor type classification such as Glioma, Meningioma, Notumor, and Pituitary. In the current study, 7,023 MRI scans were utilized that were publicly available, preprocessed, and divided into training, validation, and test sets. All of them are fine-tuned and trained for optimum performance, where the performance metrics of accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score were adapted to ascertain their efficiency. EfficientNetB3 topped the ranking list among all the used models, where it attained an accuracy of 98% in all tumor classes; hence, this model proved to be reliable. XceptionNet and CNN did quite well, where both achieved 97% and 95%, respectively, but both suffer in accurately classifying Meningioma cases. These findings then suggest that EfficientNetB3 is particularly predisposed to brain tumor classification. This study shall, therefore, bring forth the value of a number of deep learning models with large dimensions for enabling accurate and timely detection of brain tumors to improve outcomes for patients. Future studies may seek to explore the integration of such tools with explainable AI for further improvements in clinical applications.

Chitkara University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
0.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.