The North American Gap Ungulates Must Migrate Physically and Legally: Elk as a Case Study

Humans have tracked elk hoof prints in North America since ancient times, recognizing the significance of these migratory ungulates in culture, mythology, dietary value, and utility. As migratory ungulates, elk respond to changes in their environment by migrating to and from their summer and winter ranges. Today, elk migrations continue across the jurisdictional boundary of the northern United States and southern Canada, spreading ecological and economic benefits with each track they make. Unfortunately, ungulate migration is an “endangered phenomenon” due to loss of connectivity and loss of habitat. While the United States and Canada have acknowledged the importance of, and entered into agreements governing, transboundary issues, there is not an international legal framework for migratory ungulates like elk. Moreover, both the United States and Canada recognize the principle of Free, Prior, and Informed Consent, as reflected in U.S. federal agency policies, and in Canadian constitutional provisions, statutes, and agreements with First Nations. Furthermore, both countries are integrating Indigenous Peoples and their knowledge into transboundary water management contexts, but have yet to fully realize the value of this inclusive approach in transboundary wildlife management. To address this regulatory gap, the United States, Canada, Native American Tribes, and First Nations should establish a governing body for wildlife management. The uniquely positioned Tribes and First Nations along the border should be included because of their historical connection to elk and the knowledge they have acquired over thousands of years. The inclusion of Indigenous Peoples in transboundary water agreements has proven successful. Building on those principles, ungulates—like water—move across borders, and Indigenous Peoples possess unique knowledge that should be incorporated into any agreements concerning these animals as well. This proposed structure will help ensure the lasting conservation of elk for future generations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Wyoming Law Review
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59643/1942-9916.1521
Primary Topic
European and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The North American Gap Ungulates Must Migrate Physically and Legally: Elk as a Case Study

Alex Wendlandt
Wyoming Law Review
European and International Law Studies
article

The North American Gap Ungulates Must Migrate Physically and Legally: Elk as a Case Study

Alex Wendlandt
article en

Abstract

Humans have tracked elk hoof prints in North America since ancient times, recognizing the significance of these migratory ungulates in culture, mythology, dietary value, and utility. As migratory ungulates, elk respond to changes in their environment by migrating to and from their summer and winter ranges. Today, elk migrations continue across the jurisdictional boundary of the northern United States and southern Canada, spreading ecological and economic benefits with each track they make. Unfortunately, ungulate migration is an “endangered phenomenon” due to loss of connectivity and loss of habitat. While the United States and Canada have acknowledged the importance of, and entered into agreements governing, transboundary issues, there is not an international legal framework for migratory ungulates like elk. Moreover, both the United States and Canada recognize the principle of Free, Prior, and Informed Consent, as reflected in U.S. federal agency policies, and in Canadian constitutional provisions, statutes, and agreements with First Nations. Furthermore, both countries are integrating Indigenous Peoples and their knowledge into transboundary water management contexts, but have yet to fully realize the value of this inclusive approach in transboundary wildlife management. To address this regulatory gap, the United States, Canada, Native American Tribes, and First Nations should establish a governing body for wildlife management. The uniquely positioned Tribes and First Nations along the border should be included because of their historical connection to elk and the knowledge they have acquired over thousands of years. The inclusion of Indigenous Peoples in transboundary water agreements has proven successful. Building on those principles, ungulates—like water—move across borders, and Indigenous Peoples possess unique knowledge that should be incorporated into any agreements concerning these animals as well. This proposed structure will help ensure the lasting conservation of elk for future generations.

Wyoming Law ReviewVol. 25(2)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
European and International Law Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.