The Political Question of Public Lands

The Property Clause of Article IV of the United States Constitution provides: “Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States.” Thus, among other things, the Constitution assigns the disposal of federally owned lands to Congress alone. That means the other branches of the federal government, including the courts, have no jurisdiction to exercise this power or to compel Congress to use it. Put another way, when Congress does not dispose of public lands through sale or transfer, that inaction is not subject to executive override or judicial review. The only remedy for Congress’s decision to retain public lands rather than sell them is at the ballot box. In August 2024, Utah attempted to sue the federal government in the Supreme Court of the United States to compel Congress to sell or transfer millions of acres of public lands. While Utah’s quixotic effort failed, this Article treats Utah’s lawsuit as a case study in how states and others will try to circumvent Congress to compel the federal government to divest itself of public lands. It concludes any effort to achieve the forced divestment of public lands outside the law-making process in Congress is unconstitutional.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Wyoming Law Review
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59643/1942-9916.1520
Primary Topic
Urbanization and City Planning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Political Question of Public Lands

Ryan A. Semerad
Wyoming Law Review
Urbanization and City Planning
article

The Political Question of Public Lands

Ryan A. Semerad
article en

Abstract

The Property Clause of Article IV of the United States Constitution provides: “Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States.” Thus, among other things, the Constitution assigns the disposal of federally owned lands to Congress alone. That means the other branches of the federal government, including the courts, have no jurisdiction to exercise this power or to compel Congress to use it. Put another way, when Congress does not dispose of public lands through sale or transfer, that inaction is not subject to executive override or judicial review. The only remedy for Congress’s decision to retain public lands rather than sell them is at the ballot box. In August 2024, Utah attempted to sue the federal government in the Supreme Court of the United States to compel Congress to sell or transfer millions of acres of public lands. While Utah’s quixotic effort failed, this Article treats Utah’s lawsuit as a case study in how states and others will try to circumvent Congress to compel the federal government to divest itself of public lands. It concludes any effort to achieve the forced divestment of public lands outside the law-making process in Congress is unconstitutional.

Wyoming Law ReviewVol. 25(2)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Urbanization and City Planning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Political Question of Public Lands — Ryan A. Semerad · Wyoming Law Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS