Life Cycle Assessment of Artificial Intelligence Applications: Research Gaps and Opportunities

Applications based on Artificial Intelligence (AI) are increasingly being adopted, especially since tools like ChatGPT or Dall-E have become available to the public and have gained popularity. While its benefits are manifold, AI also has a significant environmental impact: AI technology usually relies on hardware which consumes a significant amount of energy, such as GPU servers. Furthermore, users normally access AI-based services via their own end devices, which also consume energy. The energy side of training and using AI models can be roughly estimated today, for example using libraries like CodeCarbon. However, a realistic estimate of AI’s environmental impact needs to include not only the energy consumption from the use of the AI, but also factors such as the (critical) raw materials needed for the construction of the hardware, and the consumption of materials and energy for the maintenance and use of the hardware throughout its life cycle. This is not feasible today. Systematic life cycle assessment of AI technology is still in its infancy. It should not be limited to calculating the CO2-equivalent, but take into account different relevant environmental impact indicators from resource use depletion to human toxicity to water consumption. This paper reviews the literature on this topic, identifies gaps and opportunities for research and argues for developing an LCA methodology for AI. It further presents an adaptation of an existing LCA methodology to AI as a first step in this direction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Procedia CIRP
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2025.01.079
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Green IT and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Life Cycle Assessment of Artificial Intelligence Applications: Research Gaps and Opportunities

Karel Van Acker, Martin Ruskowski, Ponnapat Watjanatepin, Christiane Plociennik
4 citations
Procedia CIRP
Green IT and Sustainability
2.92
article

Life Cycle Assessment of Artificial Intelligence Applications: Research Gaps and Opportunities

Karel Van Acker, Martin Ruskowski, Ponnapat Watjanatepin, Christiane Plociennik
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Applications based on Artificial Intelligence (AI) are increasingly being adopted, especially since tools like ChatGPT or Dall-E have become available to the public and have gained popularity. While its benefits are manifold, AI also has a significant environmental impact: AI technology usually relies on hardware which consumes a significant amount of energy, such as GPU servers. Furthermore, users normally access AI-based services via their own end devices, which also consume energy. The energy side of training and using AI models can be roughly estimated today, for example using libraries like CodeCarbon. However, a realistic estimate of AI’s environmental impact needs to include not only the energy consumption from the use of the AI, but also factors such as the (critical) raw materials needed for the construction of the hardware, and the consumption of materials and energy for the maintenance and use of the hardware throughout its life cycle. This is not feasible today. Systematic life cycle assessment of AI technology is still in its infancy. It should not be limited to calculating the CO2-equivalent, but take into account different relevant environmental impact indicators from resource use depletion to human toxicity to water consumption. This paper reviews the literature on this topic, identifies gaps and opportunities for research and argues for developing an LCA methodology for AI. It further presents an adaptation of an existing LCA methodology to AI as a first step in this direction.

Procedia CIRPVol. 135
German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence (DE), KU Leuven (BE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, nukleare Sicherheit und Verbraucherschutz
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Green IT and Sustainability
2.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.