A systematic decision-making process flow for circular dismantling of trains: a case study

This paper investigates the decision-making process for dismantling assets at the end of their lifecycle, focusing on maximizing circularity through reuse, resale, and recycling. Through a case study on train dismantling, this research outlines a structured process to ensure efficient, sustainable disposal of materials, guided by established frameworks and strategies prioritizing circular economy principles. The case study identifies 18 key steps involved in dismantling a train, involving eleven stakeholders, each assigned distinct roles such as responsible, accountable, supporting, advising, and informed. These roles help ensure a collaborative approach that aligns with sustainability goals. The analysis also includes insights into the critical decision-making factors that guide the prioritization of actions, such as selling surplus assets, reusing parts, and recycling remaining materials. Furthermore, the paper explores the broader application of this decision-making flow to other stakeholders and companies involved in dismantling, offering comprehensive insights for sustainable asset disposal. This study highlights how organizations can successfully implement dismantling strategies that advance circular economy objectives by outlining clear roles and responsibilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Procedia CIRP
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2025.01.061
Primary Topic
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A systematic decision-making process flow for circular dismantling of trains: a case study

Jan Braaksma, Willem Haanstra, Shantal Kartoidjojo, Thom Letteboer
Procedia CIRP
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
article

A systematic decision-making process flow for circular dismantling of trains: a case study

Jan Braaksma, Willem Haanstra, Shantal Kartoidjojo, Thom Letteboer
article en

Abstract

This paper investigates the decision-making process for dismantling assets at the end of their lifecycle, focusing on maximizing circularity through reuse, resale, and recycling. Through a case study on train dismantling, this research outlines a structured process to ensure efficient, sustainable disposal of materials, guided by established frameworks and strategies prioritizing circular economy principles. The case study identifies 18 key steps involved in dismantling a train, involving eleven stakeholders, each assigned distinct roles such as responsible, accountable, supporting, advising, and informed. These roles help ensure a collaborative approach that aligns with sustainability goals. The analysis also includes insights into the critical decision-making factors that guide the prioritization of actions, such as selling surplus assets, reusing parts, and recycling remaining materials. Furthermore, the paper explores the broader application of this decision-making flow to other stakeholders and companies involved in dismantling, offering comprehensive insights for sustainable asset disposal. This study highlights how organizations can successfully implement dismantling strategies that advance circular economy objectives by outlining clear roles and responsibilities.

Procedia CIRPVol. 135
Nederlandse Spoorwegen (NL), Nederlandse Vereniging voor Kindergeneeskunde (NL), University of Twente (NL)
ProRail
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.