Optimizing mountain railway alignments with a potential field guided 3D-RRT-star algorithm
Developing railway alignments becomes increasingly challenging in undulating terrain with densely-distributed obstacles. Traditional alignment optimization methods, which employ a design process characterized as “search for alignment-favorable environments based on trial alignments”, struggle to efficiently generate optimized alignments under these conditions. To address this problem, an environmental suitability analysis is first implemented by abstracting the study area as a set of voxels within various structural layers. The Environmental Suitability (ES) for each voxel is then formulated based on its location in different structural layers. Then, by considering the spatial distribution and the ES values, alignment-favorable regions and alignment-unfavorable regions are identified through a kernel density analysis and k-mean clustering. These regions are further represented by Potential Fields (PFields), which are integrated with a 3D Rapidly-exploring Random Tree-star (3D-RRT-star) to create a PField-RRT-star search method. Through application to a real-world mountain railway case, the PField-RRT-star method demonstrates improved search efficiency and solution quality.
Authors
- Hao Pu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2585-2678)
- Xinjie Wan
- Lihui Peng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7363-6374)
- Paul Schonfeld (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9621-2355)
- Taoran Song (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7663-2042)
- T.Y. Yang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5123-9634)
Institutions
- Central South University (CN)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Nanyang Technological University (SG)
- China Railway Group (China) (CN)
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Railway Science and Technology
- Published
- 2025-07-18
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrst.2025.07.004
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.83