The next stage of biodiversity informatics: community-driven synthesis and integration of biodiversity databases

Abstract Developing a predictive science of the biosphere depends heavily on the rapidly expanding biodiversity data that are commonly stored in biodiversity databases. Despite the proliferation of biodiversity databases, their independent operation has limited data discovery, comparison, and synthesis. Therefore, the biodiversity informatics community has called for improved alignment among these efforts to better catalog Earth's biodiversity. The primary challenges are incomplete knowledge of existing databases and incongruent taxonomic systems and data schemas. Addressing these issues will require development of a database registry, means to compare database contents, taxonomic harmonization, and tools that enable users to merge disparate databases based on their needs, all within a community of practice that enables people of various skill levels and roles to participate. We believe that synthesis and integration, driven by a growing and thriving community, will be the next stage of biodiversity informatics and will help unlock the full potential of biodiversity information.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BioScience
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biaf112
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Species Distribution and Climate Change
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The next stage of biodiversity informatics: community-driven synthesis and integration of biodiversity databases

Pamela S. Soltis, Aaron M. Lien, Adam B. Smith, Jennifer Hammock et al.
4 citations
BioScience
Species Distribution and Climate Change
7.35
article

The next stage of biodiversity informatics: community-driven synthesis and integration of biodiversity databases

Pamela S. Soltis, Aaron M. Lien, Adam B. Smith, Jennifer Hammock, Brian Joseph Enquist, Joyce C. Ho, Eric R. Sokol, Rachael V. Gallagher, Brian Maitner, Anna Willoughby, Xiao Feng, Brad Boyle, Elizabeth Wenk, Daniel Park, Xin Chen
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Developing a predictive science of the biosphere depends heavily on the rapidly expanding biodiversity data that are commonly stored in biodiversity databases. Despite the proliferation of biodiversity databases, their independent operation has limited data discovery, comparison, and synthesis. Therefore, the biodiversity informatics community has called for improved alignment among these efforts to better catalog Earth's biodiversity. The primary challenges are incomplete knowledge of existing databases and incongruent taxonomic systems and data schemas. Addressing these issues will require development of a database registry, means to compare database contents, taxonomic harmonization, and tools that enable users to merge disparate databases based on their needs, all within a community of practice that enables people of various skill levels and roles to participate. We believe that synthesis and integration, driven by a growing and thriving community, will be the next stage of biodiversity informatics and will help unlock the full potential of biodiversity information.

BioScienceVol. 75(11)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), University of Seoul (KR), Santa Fe Institute (US), Florida Museum of Natural History (US), National Museum of Natural History (US), University of Arizona (US), University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science (US), Emory University (US), University of Georgia (US), Korea University (KR), Missouri Botanical Garden (US), National Ecological Observatory Network (US), UNSW Sydney (AU), Western Sydney University (AU), University of South Florida St. Petersburg (US)
National Science Foundation
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Species Distribution and Climate Change
7.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.