How Do Smart-Device User Privacy Perspectives Compare to U.S. Privacy Law Protections?: A Comparison of Legal Protections and Consumer Perceptions for Privacy

Smart devices can record user data that companies share and process for secondary purposes. Collecting and processing such data can harm privacy, yet only five state legislatures in the United States had active comprehensive data protection laws to shield such privacy interests by May 2024. This article identifies consumer privacy rights and company responsibilities under comprehensive state data privacy laws. This study also uses an online survey of U.S. smart-device users to assess consumer desires for privacy protection of specific types of information, satisfaction with institutional privacy protection from policymakers and corporations, and general privacy concerns. After comparing consumer perspectives to protections afforded under state comprehensive data-protection laws, this article concludes that consumers have significant privacy concerns that are not addressed by state comprehensive data privacy laws.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communication Law and Policy
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2025.2511044
Primary Topic
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Do Smart-Device User Privacy Perspectives Compare to U.S. Privacy Law Protections?: A Comparison of Legal Protections and Consumer Perceptions for Privacy

Jessica Shaw, Erin K. Coyle, Yongick Jeong
Communication Law and Policy
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
article

How Do Smart-Device User Privacy Perspectives Compare to U.S. Privacy Law Protections?: A Comparison of Legal Protections and Consumer Perceptions for Privacy

Jessica Shaw, Erin K. Coyle, Yongick Jeong
article en

Abstract

Smart devices can record user data that companies share and process for secondary purposes. Collecting and processing such data can harm privacy, yet only five state legislatures in the United States had active comprehensive data protection laws to shield such privacy interests by May 2024. This article identifies consumer privacy rights and company responsibilities under comprehensive state data privacy laws. This study also uses an online survey of U.S. smart-device users to assess consumer desires for privacy protection of specific types of information, satisfaction with institutional privacy protection from policymakers and corporations, and general privacy concerns. After comparing consumer perspectives to protections afforded under state comprehensive data-protection laws, this article concludes that consumers have significant privacy concerns that are not addressed by state comprehensive data privacy laws.

Communication Law and PolicyVol. 29(4)
Louisiana State University (US), Arizona State University (US), Temple University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How Do Smart-Device User Privacy Perspectives Compare to U.S. Privacy Law Protections?: A Comparison of Legal Protections and Consumer Perceptions for Privacy — Jessica Shaw, Erin K. Coyle, et al. · Communication Law and Policy (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS