Large Language Model-supported Intelligent Evaluation of Open-ended Tasks: Case Studies and Reflections Based on SOU

Developing execution-based proficiency requires the use of more open-ended tasks, which present significant assessment challenges due to the unstructured nature of their responses. These challenges include the absence of standard answers, difficulty in objectifying assessment indicators, subjectivity in teachers' evaluations, and the increased complexity of the assessment process. The development of Large Language Models (LLM) in artificial intelligence offers a potential solution to these issues. This study explores human-AI synergy in the assessment of open-ended tasks using LLM and aims to address the challenges of traditional assessment methods. The research involves a pilot implementation of intelligent assessment, focusing on innovative teaching scheme design, human-AI collaboration in assessment, result review and analysis, and iterative improvements. Findings indicate that LLM-assisted assessment can initially support the evaluation of open-ended tasks; however, reliability issues persist, necessitating manual review. While assessment criteria can be structured through rule-based guidance, the diverse nature of open-ended tasks demands greater adaptability in assessment frameworks. The study also found that using large models to assist teachers in evaluating students' open-ended tasks is feasible to a certain extent. However, there are risks of hallucinations in large models as well as ethical and moral concerns, which can be addressed through risk warnings and human-AI collaboration. Additionally, compared to assessments in other language-related writing tasks, setting intelligent evaluation metrics for open-ended tasks in management courses is relatively easier. At the same time, it places higher demands on teachers' professional application skills and requires strong support and patience from schools. As an exploratory study on AI applications in education, this research has practical implications but requires further investigation to enhance its implementation and impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/cste64638.2025.11091932
Primary Topic
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Large Language Model-supported Intelligent Evaluation of Open-ended Tasks: Case Studies and Reflections Based on SOU

De Li Lin, Wei Zhi-hui, Qing Liu, Richard Sun
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
article

Large Language Model-supported Intelligent Evaluation of Open-ended Tasks: Case Studies and Reflections Based on SOU

De Li Lin, Wei Zhi-hui, Qing Liu, Richard Sun
article en

Abstract

Developing execution-based proficiency requires the use of more open-ended tasks, which present significant assessment challenges due to the unstructured nature of their responses. These challenges include the absence of standard answers, difficulty in objectifying assessment indicators, subjectivity in teachers' evaluations, and the increased complexity of the assessment process. The development of Large Language Models (LLM) in artificial intelligence offers a potential solution to these issues. This study explores human-AI synergy in the assessment of open-ended tasks using LLM and aims to address the challenges of traditional assessment methods. The research involves a pilot implementation of intelligent assessment, focusing on innovative teaching scheme design, human-AI collaboration in assessment, result review and analysis, and iterative improvements. Findings indicate that LLM-assisted assessment can initially support the evaluation of open-ended tasks; however, reliability issues persist, necessitating manual review. While assessment criteria can be structured through rule-based guidance, the diverse nature of open-ended tasks demands greater adaptability in assessment frameworks. The study also found that using large models to assist teachers in evaluating students' open-ended tasks is feasible to a certain extent. However, there are risks of hallucinations in large models as well as ethical and moral concerns, which can be addressed through risk warnings and human-AI collaboration. Additionally, compared to assessments in other language-related writing tasks, setting intelligent evaluation metrics for open-ended tasks in management courses is relatively easier. At the same time, it places higher demands on teachers' professional application skills and requires strong support and patience from schools. As an exploratory study on AI applications in education, this research has practical implications but requires further investigation to enhance its implementation and impact.

Shanghai Open University (CN), Empire State University (US)
Open University
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.