Exploring the Computational Thinking Process of College Students: Collaborative Programming with LLMs

Computational thinking (CT) has gained increasing attention from educators and practitioners due to its effectiveness in fostering student development, particularly in programming courses. Meanwhile, with the rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs), an increasing number of teachers and students are incorporating AI-assisted teaching and learning. However, empirical research on the patterns of CT processes when students adopt different AI-assisted learning strategies remains limited. This study explores the differences in CT process patterns when students use two different types of LLMs: General AI Group (GAIG) and No Code AI Group (NCAIG). Results showed that: (1) The social perspective is the most dominant in CT (2) Questioning and connecting co-occur most often, followed by connecting and sequencing, as well as questioning and sequencing; (3) Students' prior knowledge significantly affects their CT patterns. These findings provide empirical support for educators to effectively guide students in leveraging AI technology to enhance CT in instructional settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/cste64638.2025.11092183
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Computational Thinking Process of College Students: Collaborative Programming with LLMs

Qian Fu, Zhou Li, X. L. Zheng
Online Learning and Analytics
article

Exploring the Computational Thinking Process of College Students: Collaborative Programming with LLMs

Qian Fu, Zhou Li, X. L. Zheng
article en

Abstract

Computational thinking (CT) has gained increasing attention from educators and practitioners due to its effectiveness in fostering student development, particularly in programming courses. Meanwhile, with the rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs), an increasing number of teachers and students are incorporating AI-assisted teaching and learning. However, empirical research on the patterns of CT processes when students adopt different AI-assisted learning strategies remains limited. This study explores the differences in CT process patterns when students use two different types of LLMs: General AI Group (GAIG) and No Code AI Group (NCAIG). Results showed that: (1) The social perspective is the most dominant in CT (2) Questioning and connecting co-occur most often, followed by connecting and sequencing, as well as questioning and sequencing; (3) Students' prior knowledge significantly affects their CT patterns. These findings provide empirical support for educators to effectively guide students in leveraging AI technology to enhance CT in instructional settings.

Beijing Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Online Learning and Analytics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.