Student teacher learning in school-university partnerships: A systematic review

• Identifies three levels of school-university partnership practices from 67 articles. • The three levels – program & partnership, curriculum & pedagogy, and activity & tool are interrelated with each other. • Student teachers change in dispositions and beliefs, knowledges and understandings, and performances and skills. • Delineates a framework for understanding student teacher learning in partnerships. • Provides directions for future partnership practices, research and policy. School-university partnerships provide essential environments in which student teachers (STs) learn to teach. Despite the increasing number of studies conducted within the partnership contexts, the impact of partnership practices on STs’ learning processes or outcomes has not been examined in a systemic way. Drawing on growing empirical evidence, this systematic review synthesized findings from 67 articles published in peer-reviewed journals between 2011 and 2024. We found that three interconnected levels of partnership interventions – the program & partnership level, the curriculum & pedagogy level, the activity & tool level – were simultaneously applied by teacher educators in the selected studies; we also identified changes in STs’ dispositions and beliefs (knowing why), knowledges and understandings (knowing what), and performances and skills (knowing how). Based on the findings, a framework for understanding STs’ learning in partnership contexts is further delineated, with implications for policymakers, practitioners, and researchers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Educational Research
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2025.102692
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
26.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Student teacher learning in school-university partnerships: A systematic review

Jingtian Zhou, Jocelyn L. N. Wong
3 citations
International Journal of Educational Research
Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
26.78
article

Student teacher learning in school-university partnerships: A systematic review

Jingtian Zhou, Jocelyn L. N. Wong
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• Identifies three levels of school-university partnership practices from 67 articles. • The three levels – program & partnership, curriculum & pedagogy, and activity & tool are interrelated with each other. • Student teachers change in dispositions and beliefs, knowledges and understandings, and performances and skills. • Delineates a framework for understanding student teacher learning in partnerships. • Provides directions for future partnership practices, research and policy. School-university partnerships provide essential environments in which student teachers (STs) learn to teach. Despite the increasing number of studies conducted within the partnership contexts, the impact of partnership practices on STs’ learning processes or outcomes has not been examined in a systemic way. Drawing on growing empirical evidence, this systematic review synthesized findings from 67 articles published in peer-reviewed journals between 2011 and 2024. We found that three interconnected levels of partnership interventions – the program & partnership level, the curriculum & pedagogy level, the activity & tool level – were simultaneously applied by teacher educators in the selected studies; we also identified changes in STs’ dispositions and beliefs (knowing why), knowledges and understandings (knowing what), and performances and skills (knowing how). Based on the findings, a framework for understanding STs’ learning in partnership contexts is further delineated, with implications for policymakers, practitioners, and researchers.

International Journal of Educational ResearchVol. 133
Education University of Hong Kong (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
26.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.