Predicting survival of persons with newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma

Predicting survival in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients accurately remains challenging. Although mSMART3.0 is widely used it has not been rigorously tested for prediction accuracy. We analysed clinical and laboratory variables in 1,008 NDMM patients, randomly split into a training set (n = 704) and a validation set (n = 304). Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses identified independent prognostic factors, forming a baseline survival model. For patients with available mSMART3.0 data, we integrated it with the baseline nomogram to enhance predictive accuracy. Time-dependent area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (timeROC), calibration plots as well as comparisons with other survival prediction systems were used to estimated model performance. The baseline models, incorporating eight factors, achieved 5-year survival AUCs of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.72–0.81) in the training set and 0.73 (95% CI: 0.66–0.80) in the validation set. In the training set, 5-year survival was 34% (95% CI: 28–41%) in the high-risk group versus 72% (95% CI: 67–78%) in the low-risk group (p < 0.001), with similar differences observed in the validation set. The model exhibited excellent discrimination and calibration in both sets. In the training cohort the merged nomogram increased the 5-year survival AUCs of mSMART3.0 from 0.64 (0.57, 0.71) to 0.75 (0.67, 0.83; p = 0.003), better than the other staging systems of MM. The proposed nomograms increased the survival prediction accuracy in patients with NDMM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Cell International
Published
2025-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-025-03916-6
Primary Topic
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting survival of persons with newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma

Yang Liang, Robert Peter Gale, Yun Wang, Limei Zhang
Cancer Cell International
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
article

Predicting survival of persons with newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma

Yang Liang, Robert Peter Gale, Yun Wang, Limei Zhang
article en

Abstract

Predicting survival in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients accurately remains challenging. Although mSMART3.0 is widely used it has not been rigorously tested for prediction accuracy. We analysed clinical and laboratory variables in 1,008 NDMM patients, randomly split into a training set (n = 704) and a validation set (n = 304). Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses identified independent prognostic factors, forming a baseline survival model. For patients with available mSMART3.0 data, we integrated it with the baseline nomogram to enhance predictive accuracy. Time-dependent area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (timeROC), calibration plots as well as comparisons with other survival prediction systems were used to estimated model performance. The baseline models, incorporating eight factors, achieved 5-year survival AUCs of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.72–0.81) in the training set and 0.73 (95% CI: 0.66–0.80) in the validation set. In the training set, 5-year survival was 34% (95% CI: 28–41%) in the high-risk group versus 72% (95% CI: 67–78%) in the low-risk group (p < 0.001), with similar differences observed in the validation set. The model exhibited excellent discrimination and calibration in both sets. In the training cohort the merged nomogram increased the 5-year survival AUCs of mSMART3.0 from 0.64 (0.57, 0.71) to 0.75 (0.67, 0.83; p = 0.003), better than the other staging systems of MM. The proposed nomograms increased the survival prediction accuracy in patients with NDMM.

Cancer Cell InternationalVol. 25(1)
Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (CN), Imperial College London (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Sun Yat-sen University
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.