Exploring the link between the risk of violent injury in adolescents and historic redlining practices

Violent injuries tend to cluster together geospatially. The discriminatory housing practice of redlining undertaken by the United States federal government in the 1930s has been repeatedly linked with various contemporary community-level disparities. However, no known work has explored the association between historical redlining and the risk of violent injuries among adolescents. To this end, we utilized surveillance data of adolescent patients (N = 401) who presented to a Level I trauma center in Richmond, VA, for violence-based injuries across 2 years (2022-2023). Our analyses revealed significant spatial clustering of violence events using Moran's I after controlling for population density. High violence clusters (N<sub>22</sub> = 9, N<sub>23</sub> = 12), and low violence clusters (N<sub>22</sub> = 9, N<sub>23</sub> = 10) were identified across both years. Historically redlined neighborhoods comprised most of the high-violence regions identified (i.e., 85.71% of hot spots were in redlined areas). Our findings suggest that the legacy of historic redlining practices in Richmond, VA is observable in the current-day risks of violent injury for adolescents. Interventions aimed at reducing community violence should consider how such efforts may address the extant effects of past policies (e.g., redlining) as one means of reducing violence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Community Psychology
Published
2025-08-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.70005
Primary Topic
Crime Patterns and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the link between the risk of violent injury in adolescents and historic redlining practices

Diane L. Bishop, Derek A. Chapman, Samuel J. West, Nicholas D. Thomson et al.
American Journal of Community Psychology
Crime Patterns and Interventions
article

Exploring the link between the risk of violent injury in adolescents and historic redlining practices

Diane L. Bishop, Derek A. Chapman, Samuel J. West, Nicholas D. Thomson, Anabeel Sen, Thomas A. Nixon
article en

Abstract

Violent injuries tend to cluster together geospatially. The discriminatory housing practice of redlining undertaken by the United States federal government in the 1930s has been repeatedly linked with various contemporary community-level disparities. However, no known work has explored the association between historical redlining and the risk of violent injuries among adolescents. To this end, we utilized surveillance data of adolescent patients (N = 401) who presented to a Level I trauma center in Richmond, VA, for violence-based injuries across 2 years (2022-2023). Our analyses revealed significant spatial clustering of violence events using Moran's I after controlling for population density. High violence clusters (N<sub>22</sub> = 9, N<sub>23</sub> = 12), and low violence clusters (N<sub>22</sub> = 9, N<sub>23</sub> = 10) were identified across both years. Historically redlined neighborhoods comprised most of the high-violence regions identified (i.e., 85.71% of hot spots were in redlined areas). Our findings suggest that the legacy of historic redlining practices in Richmond, VA is observable in the current-day risks of violent injury for adolescents. Interventions aimed at reducing community violence should consider how such efforts may address the extant effects of past policies (e.g., redlining) as one means of reducing violence.

American Journal of Community PsychologyVol. 76(3-4)
Virginia State University (US), Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Georgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance, National Institutes of Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Crime Patterns and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.