Patient and nodule characteristics associated with adherence to lung cancer screening in a large integrated healthcare system

We examined the association of pulmonary nodule characteristics with adherence to follow-up low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) after the initial screening in lung cancer screening. Using 2014-2021 electronic health record data from a large integrated health system, we analyzed adherence to Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) follow-up recommendations, considering socio-demographic, clinical factors, and natural language processing-extracted nodule characteristics. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed the impact of these factors on adherence to follow-up LDCT. Among 2,673 individuals (mean age = 66.8 ± 5.9 years), overall adherence was 27.6%, with rates of 24.2%, 27.5%, 26.7%, and 64.0% for Lung-RADS categories 1-4 A. A race-ethnicity disparity in adherence was observed among category 1, with non-Hispanic blacks less likely to adhere than non-Hispanic whites (OR[95% CI] = 0.59[0.41-0.85]). Among patients in categories 2 to 4 A, category 4 A was significantly more likely to adhere (OR[95% CI] = 3.18[1.86-5.40]) and having more nodules increased adherence (OR[95% CI] = 1.12[1.09-1.14]). Adherence to follow-up LDCT is suboptimal, driven by patient and nodule characteristics, and influenced by how physicians communicated initial CT results. These findings underscore the need for structured screening programs and consistent follow-up protocols to improve adherence and ensure effective lung cancer screening.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-15053-1
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient and nodule characteristics associated with adherence to lung cancer screening in a large integrated healthcare system

Yonghui Wu, Jessica Y. Islam, Ramzi G. Salloum, Jiang Bian et al.
Scientific Reports
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Patient and nodule characteristics associated with adherence to lung cancer screening in a large integrated healthcare system

Yonghui Wu, Jessica Y. Islam, Ramzi G. Salloum, Jiang Bian, Dejana Braithwaite, Xuhong Zhang, Hiren J. Mehta, Yi Guo, Ya‐Chen Tina Shih, Muxuan Liang, Shuang Yang
article en

Abstract

We examined the association of pulmonary nodule characteristics with adherence to follow-up low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) after the initial screening in lung cancer screening. Using 2014-2021 electronic health record data from a large integrated health system, we analyzed adherence to Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) follow-up recommendations, considering socio-demographic, clinical factors, and natural language processing-extracted nodule characteristics. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed the impact of these factors on adherence to follow-up LDCT. Among 2,673 individuals (mean age = 66.8 ± 5.9 years), overall adherence was 27.6%, with rates of 24.2%, 27.5%, 26.7%, and 64.0% for Lung-RADS categories 1-4 A. A race-ethnicity disparity in adherence was observed among category 1, with non-Hispanic blacks less likely to adhere than non-Hispanic whites (OR[95% CI] = 0.59[0.41-0.85]). Among patients in categories 2 to 4 A, category 4 A was significantly more likely to adhere (OR[95% CI] = 3.18[1.86-5.40]) and having more nodules increased adherence (OR[95% CI] = 1.12[1.09-1.14]). Adherence to follow-up LDCT is suboptimal, driven by patient and nodule characteristics, and influenced by how physicians communicated initial CT results. These findings underscore the need for structured screening programs and consistent follow-up protocols to improve adherence and ensure effective lung cancer screening.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Johnson & Johnson (United States) (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of Florida Health (US), Moffitt Cancer Center (US), University of Florida (US), Indiana University Bloomington (US), UF Health Cancer Center, University of Florida Health Science Center (US), Florida College (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.