Why NHS hospital co-morbidity research may be wrong: how clinical coding fails to identify the impact of diabetes mellitus on cancer survival

Clinical coding provides inaccurate diabetes diagnosis date and detection resulting in meaningful differences in analytic outcomes. This supports the use of more detailed comorbidity data definitions. Results casts doubt over research reliant on hospital clinical coding alone and the generalisability of some comorbidity and frailty scoring systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Cancer
Published
2025-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-025-03136-9
Primary Topic
Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why NHS hospital co-morbidity research may be wrong: how clinical coding fails to identify the impact of diabetes mellitus on cancer survival

C McInerney, Kieran Zucker, Paul D. Baxter, Adam Glaser et al.
British Journal of Cancer
Chronic Disease Management Strategies
article

Why NHS hospital co-morbidity research may be wrong: how clinical coding fails to identify the impact of diabetes mellitus on cancer survival

C McInerney, Kieran Zucker, Paul D. Baxter, Adam Glaser, Geoffrey Hall
article en

Abstract

Clinical coding provides inaccurate diabetes diagnosis date and detection resulting in meaningful differences in analytic outcomes. This supports the use of more detailed comorbidity data definitions. Results casts doubt over research reliant on hospital clinical coding alone and the generalisability of some comorbidity and frailty scoring systems.

British Journal of CancerVol. 133(8)
University of Leeds (GB), Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), University of Sheffield (GB)
Macmillan Cancer Support, National Institute for Health and Care Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Chronic Disease Management Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.