Legal Consequences of a Statement Letter for the Transfer and Acceptance of Disputed Land Rights

The increasing public demand for land is closely linked to the transfer of land rights. Ideally, no legal action should be taken regarding the transfer of rights over land that is currently under dispute in court. However, normatively, such transfers are permitted under the revised ministerial regulation. Article 39 paragraph (1) letter F of Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration states that "a Land Deed Official (PPAT) must refuse to draw up a deed if the object of the legal act is in dispute concerning its physical and/or juridical data." In contrast, Article 126 paragraph (2) of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency Regulation No. 16 of 2021 allows the registration of land rights transfer under dispute, provided the parties involved issue a "statement letter" from both the transferor and transferee. This research addresses the issue of normative inconsistency between these two provisions. The study applies normative juridical research with statutory and conceptual approaches. The legal materials used include primary, secondary, tertiary sources, and interviews. Data were analyzed through legal interpretation, systematization, and evaluation, supported by literature review from various academic libraries and legal documentation centers

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Multidisiplin Madani
Published
2025-06-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55927/mudima.v5i6.356
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legal Consequences of a Statement Letter for the Transfer and Acceptance of Disputed Land Rights

Dyah Aju Wisnuwardhani, Sindy Sri Widyawati Sembiring Brahmana, Amelia Sri Kusumadewi
1 citations
Jurnal Multidisiplin Madani
Legal Studies and Policies
15.98
article

Legal Consequences of a Statement Letter for the Transfer and Acceptance of Disputed Land Rights

Dyah Aju Wisnuwardhani, Sindy Sri Widyawati Sembiring Brahmana, Amelia Sri Kusumadewi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The increasing public demand for land is closely linked to the transfer of land rights. Ideally, no legal action should be taken regarding the transfer of rights over land that is currently under dispute in court. However, normatively, such transfers are permitted under the revised ministerial regulation. Article 39 paragraph (1) letter F of Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration states that "a Land Deed Official (PPAT) must refuse to draw up a deed if the object of the legal act is in dispute concerning its physical and/or juridical data." In contrast, Article 126 paragraph (2) of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency Regulation No. 16 of 2021 allows the registration of land rights transfer under dispute, provided the parties involved issue a "statement letter" from both the transferor and transferee. This research addresses the issue of normative inconsistency between these two provisions. The study applies normative juridical research with statutory and conceptual approaches. The legal materials used include primary, secondary, tertiary sources, and interviews. Data were analyzed through legal interpretation, systematization, and evaluation, supported by literature review from various academic libraries and legal documentation centers

Jurnal Multidisiplin MadaniVol. 5(6)
University of Brawijaya (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Legal Studies and Policies
15.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.