Three decades of democratization in former soviet republics: Success or failure?

The research explores the issue of democratization in former Soviet republics. Over the past three decades, these countries have experienced a wide range of political transitions, from nascent democracies to enduring autocracies. The core purpose of the research is to analyze the main theories of political transition and examine the main factors that have influenced the political trajectories in former Soviet republics, including their economic development, regional geopolitics, the role of international organizations, and domestic societal pressures. The research is conducted using the methodology of comparative analysis of relevant theories and concepts on democratization, as well as empirical and statistical data that are largely used to define the peculiarities of political transition in former Soviet republics. The study finds that while some republics have made significant strides toward democratic governance, others have faced setbacks or retreated into authoritarianism. The autocratic political culture inherited from the Soviet Union was maintained by Russian and some other post-Soviet rulers to foster their centralized power. This circumstance played a crucial role in democratization in the entire former Soviet region. The economic, energy, and security dependencies on Russia hindered political reforms in some republics that prioritized a democratic path of development. In others, democratic transitions were recognized as "color revolutions" supported by the West, aiming to strategically weaken Russia. In turn, Russia played the role of a locomotive to deter democratization not only on its territory but also in its near and far abroad. It is also concluded that domestic political efforts, international assistance, and Russia's geopolitical deterrence can reload successful democratization in former Soviet republics with a democratic vision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies
Published
2025-06-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v8i4.7938
Primary Topic
Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Three decades of democratization in former soviet republics: Success or failure?

Hayk Sukiasyan, Emil Ordukhanyan, Levon Shirinyan, Gohar Ananyan
International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies
Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
article

Three decades of democratization in former soviet republics: Success or failure?

Hayk Sukiasyan, Emil Ordukhanyan, Levon Shirinyan, Gohar Ananyan
article en

Abstract

The research explores the issue of democratization in former Soviet republics. Over the past three decades, these countries have experienced a wide range of political transitions, from nascent democracies to enduring autocracies. The core purpose of the research is to analyze the main theories of political transition and examine the main factors that have influenced the political trajectories in former Soviet republics, including their economic development, regional geopolitics, the role of international organizations, and domestic societal pressures. The research is conducted using the methodology of comparative analysis of relevant theories and concepts on democratization, as well as empirical and statistical data that are largely used to define the peculiarities of political transition in former Soviet republics. The study finds that while some republics have made significant strides toward democratic governance, others have faced setbacks or retreated into authoritarianism. The autocratic political culture inherited from the Soviet Union was maintained by Russian and some other post-Soviet rulers to foster their centralized power. This circumstance played a crucial role in democratization in the entire former Soviet region. The economic, energy, and security dependencies on Russia hindered political reforms in some republics that prioritized a democratic path of development. In others, democratic transitions were recognized as "color revolutions" supported by the West, aiming to strategically weaken Russia. In turn, Russia played the role of a locomotive to deter democratization not only on its territory but also in its near and far abroad. It is also concluded that domestic political efforts, international assistance, and Russia's geopolitical deterrence can reload successful democratization in former Soviet republics with a democratic vision.

International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific StudiesVol. 8(4)
Armenian State Pedagogical University after Khachatur Abovian (AM), National Academy of Sciences of Armenia (AM)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.