Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Ceftazidime/Avibactam in Patients With Gram‐Negative Bacterial Infections

Objectives: This study aimed to characterize ceftazidime/avibactam trough concentrations ( C min ) in patients infected with resistant Gram‐negative bacteria. Additionally, we assessed the risk factor associated with clinical cure, including joint optimal pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target. Methods: We conducted a single‐center observational retrospective study involving patients receiving ceftazidime/avibactam therapy for Gram‐negative infections and undergoing therapeutic drug monitoring of ceftazidime and avibactam. Analysis was performed on the C min of ceftazidime and avibactam. The joint PK/PD target of ceftazidime/avibactam was considered as optimal when both the PK/PD targets of ceftazidime (100% f T > 4 × MIC) and avibactam (100% f T > C T ) were simultaneously achieved; quasi‐optimal if only one was achieved; and suboptimal if neither was achieved. Finally, logistic regression analysis was utilized to detect potential variables associated with clinical cure. Results: This study analyzed a total of 39 infected patients, with results showing that the C min of ceftazidime and avibactam was 24.1 ± 14.3 mg/L (coefficients of variation 59.5%), and 6.0 ± 4.4 mg/L (coefficients of variation 73.5%), respectively. Patients with renal insufficiency exhibited significantly higher C min of ceftazidime and avibactam compared to those with normal renal function ( p < 0.05). Similarly, C min were elevated in patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) versus non‐CRRT recipients ( p < 0.05). No significant difference in C min of ceftazidime and avibactam was observed between elderly and nonelderly patients. Clinically cured patients accounted for 76.9% (30/39) of the total. For 23 infected patients with minimum inhibitory concentration results, optimal joint PK/PD target was observed in 16 patients (69.6%) and quasi‐optimal in 7 patients (30.4%). Independent predictors of clinical cure were found to be optimal joint PK/PD target and co‐administered with aztreonam. Conclusions: The findings indicated that the C min of ceftazidime and avibactam exhibit significant variability. With the current regimen of ceftazidime/avibactam, the majority of patients can achieve clinical cure and optimal PK/PD target.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/jcpt/6674305
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Ceftazidime/Avibactam in Patients With Gram‐Negative Bacterial Infections

Ruiying Han, Ying Zhang, Taotao Wang, Dan Sun et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics
Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
1.39
article

Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Ceftazidime/Avibactam in Patients With Gram‐Negative Bacterial Infections

Ruiying Han, Ying Zhang, Taotao Wang, Dan Sun, Baosen Yue
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to characterize ceftazidime/avibactam trough concentrations ( C min ) in patients infected with resistant Gram‐negative bacteria. Additionally, we assessed the risk factor associated with clinical cure, including joint optimal pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target. Methods: We conducted a single‐center observational retrospective study involving patients receiving ceftazidime/avibactam therapy for Gram‐negative infections and undergoing therapeutic drug monitoring of ceftazidime and avibactam. Analysis was performed on the C min of ceftazidime and avibactam. The joint PK/PD target of ceftazidime/avibactam was considered as optimal when both the PK/PD targets of ceftazidime (100% f T > 4 × MIC) and avibactam (100% f T > C T ) were simultaneously achieved; quasi‐optimal if only one was achieved; and suboptimal if neither was achieved. Finally, logistic regression analysis was utilized to detect potential variables associated with clinical cure. Results: This study analyzed a total of 39 infected patients, with results showing that the C min of ceftazidime and avibactam was 24.1 ± 14.3 mg/L (coefficients of variation 59.5%), and 6.0 ± 4.4 mg/L (coefficients of variation 73.5%), respectively. Patients with renal insufficiency exhibited significantly higher C min of ceftazidime and avibactam compared to those with normal renal function ( p < 0.05). Similarly, C min were elevated in patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) versus non‐CRRT recipients ( p < 0.05). No significant difference in C min of ceftazidime and avibactam was observed between elderly and nonelderly patients. Clinically cured patients accounted for 76.9% (30/39) of the total. For 23 infected patients with minimum inhibitory concentration results, optimal joint PK/PD target was observed in 16 patients (69.6%) and quasi‐optimal in 7 patients (30.4%). Independent predictors of clinical cure were found to be optimal joint PK/PD target and co‐administered with aztreonam. Conclusions: The findings indicated that the C min of ceftazidime and avibactam exhibit significant variability. With the current regimen of ceftazidime/avibactam, the majority of patients can achieve clinical cure and optimal PK/PD target.

Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and TherapeuticsVol. 2025(1)
First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN), Shaanxi Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
Yakult Bio-Science Foundation, Key Research and Development Projects of Shaanxi Province
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.