Comparison of Google, Baidu, DeepL Chinese-Indonesian translations in AI Era

This study attempts to evaluate the quality of Chinese Indonesian machine translation offered by Google Translate, Baidu Translate, and DeepL in the context of the rapidly evolving artificial intelligence landscape. The study assesses the translation based on linguistic accuracy in terms of both syntactic and semantic approaches, using qualitative data from a sample set of 85 business language vocabularies commonly used in business usage concepts. The results reveal specific strengths and weaknesses. Google excels in overall accuracy and user accessibility; Baidu demonstrates a nuanced understanding of Mandarin cultural references, while DeepL offers improved fluency and naturalness. However, the overall translation score reveals several limitations in machine translation, particularly when it comes to translating standard vocabulary. This study emphasizes the need for machine translation system designs to bridge linguistic and cultural gaps. These findings provide significant insights for educators, translators, and developers who want to utilize AI-powered translation systems in multilingual communication.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ic4e65071.2025.11075434
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Google, Baidu, DeepL Chinese-Indonesian translations in AI Era

Clara Herlina Karjo, Mei Rianto Chandra
1 citations
Natural Language Processing Techniques
2.48
article

Comparison of Google, Baidu, DeepL Chinese-Indonesian translations in AI Era

Clara Herlina Karjo, Mei Rianto Chandra
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study attempts to evaluate the quality of Chinese Indonesian machine translation offered by Google Translate, Baidu Translate, and DeepL in the context of the rapidly evolving artificial intelligence landscape. The study assesses the translation based on linguistic accuracy in terms of both syntactic and semantic approaches, using qualitative data from a sample set of 85 business language vocabularies commonly used in business usage concepts. The results reveal specific strengths and weaknesses. Google excels in overall accuracy and user accessibility; Baidu demonstrates a nuanced understanding of Mandarin cultural references, while DeepL offers improved fluency and naturalness. However, the overall translation score reveals several limitations in machine translation, particularly when it comes to translating standard vocabulary. This study emphasizes the need for machine translation system designs to bridge linguistic and cultural gaps. These findings provide significant insights for educators, translators, and developers who want to utilize AI-powered translation systems in multilingual communication.

Binus University (ID)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.