The Effect of Calibration Errors When Combining Sound Field Interpolation with Head-Related Transfer Functions

In this work, we study the problem of estimating the in-ear sound field using microphone measurements at nearby positions. Typically, the sound field is first interpolated to the position of the head under free-field assumptions, followed by filtering through pre-measured head-related transfer functions (HRTFs). While properties of free-field interpolation methods have been well studied with respect to calibration errors, less is known about these properties when used in combination with a head-related transfer function. Herein, these properties are evaluated through controlled experiments in an anechoic chamber. The results indicate that, in the presence of errors in the assumed temperature and diffuseness of the sound field, it is always beneficial to use HRTFs on top of free-field interpolation for interpolating the in-ear sound field. However, interestingly, for large errors in the assumed orientation of the head, the use of an HRTF can even produce worse interpolation as compared to free-field interpolation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ssp64130.2025.11073276
Primary Topic
Speech and Audio Processing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect of Calibration Errors When Combining Sound Field Interpolation with Head-Related Transfer Functions

Filip Elvander, Andreas Jakobsson, David Sundström, Anton Björkman
Speech and Audio Processing
article

The Effect of Calibration Errors When Combining Sound Field Interpolation with Head-Related Transfer Functions

Filip Elvander, Andreas Jakobsson, David Sundström, Anton Björkman
article en

Abstract

In this work, we study the problem of estimating the in-ear sound field using microphone measurements at nearby positions. Typically, the sound field is first interpolated to the position of the head under free-field assumptions, followed by filtering through pre-measured head-related transfer functions (HRTFs). While properties of free-field interpolation methods have been well studied with respect to calibration errors, less is known about these properties when used in combination with a head-related transfer function. Herein, these properties are evaluated through controlled experiments in an anechoic chamber. The results indicate that, in the presence of errors in the assumed temperature and diffuseness of the sound field, it is always beneficial to use HRTFs on top of free-field interpolation for interpolating the in-ear sound field. However, interestingly, for large errors in the assumed orientation of the head, the use of an HRTF can even produce worse interpolation as compared to free-field interpolation.

Statistics Sweden (SE), Lund University (SE), Aalto University (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Speech and Audio Processing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.