Perspectives on Serbia’s China-EU hedging strategy: Resilient to de-hedging?

In an increasingly multipolar international system, small states like Serbia exert complex strategic dilemmas in navigating great power competition. This paper investigates Serbia's hedging strategy between its two main poles of foreign policy preference-China and the European Union-by integrating political, security, and economic insights. The authors assess three possible strategic orientations: Serbia's China-bound hedging approach, a de-hedging shift toward bandwagoning with the EU, and a ?win-win? strategy that seeks to synergize the interests of both powers. Using a mixed-methods approach, we employ quantitative analysis based on the COMPASS Dataset alongside qualitative assessments of key contingency scenarios to evaluate Serbia's strategic calculus during 2024. Our findings show that risk-prone contingencies have an important impact on both hedging and de-hedging policies. They highlight the importance of adaptive, multipolar foreign policies in maintaining strategic autonomy while maximizing economic and security benefits. The analysis presented herein underscores that Serbia's hedging strategy is a delicate and complex approach to navigating the contemporary geopolitical landscape, implicating leveraging economic opportunities, security demands and political changes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medjunarodni problemi
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2298/medjp2502193s
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perspectives on Serbia’s China-EU hedging strategy: Resilient to de-hedging?

Nenad Stekić, Aleksandar Mitić
1 citations
Medjunarodni problemi
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
3.13
article

Perspectives on Serbia’s China-EU hedging strategy: Resilient to de-hedging?

Nenad Stekić, Aleksandar Mitić
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In an increasingly multipolar international system, small states like Serbia exert complex strategic dilemmas in navigating great power competition. This paper investigates Serbia's hedging strategy between its two main poles of foreign policy preference-China and the European Union-by integrating political, security, and economic insights. The authors assess three possible strategic orientations: Serbia's China-bound hedging approach, a de-hedging shift toward bandwagoning with the EU, and a ?win-win? strategy that seeks to synergize the interests of both powers. Using a mixed-methods approach, we employ quantitative analysis based on the COMPASS Dataset alongside qualitative assessments of key contingency scenarios to evaluate Serbia's strategic calculus during 2024. Our findings show that risk-prone contingencies have an important impact on both hedging and de-hedging policies. They highlight the importance of adaptive, multipolar foreign policies in maintaining strategic autonomy while maximizing economic and security benefits. The analysis presented herein underscores that Serbia's hedging strategy is a delicate and complex approach to navigating the contemporary geopolitical landscape, implicating leveraging economic opportunities, security demands and political changes.

Medjunarodni problemiVol. 77(2)
Institute of International Politics and Economics (RS)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Perspectives on Serbia’s China-EU hedging strategy: Resilient to de-hedging? — Nenad Stekić, Aleksandar Mitić · Medjunarodni problemi (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS