The Limits of Employer Authority in the Digital Age: Monitoring Employee’s Duties Performance

By virtue of the legal nature of the employment relationship, the employer possesses managerial authority, which includes the right to monitor employees’ performance of their job duties. Digitalization provides employers with new technologies for real-time monitoring (cameras, GPS trackers, biometric scanning, etc.). These technologies may lead to violations of privacy rights. Russian legislation lacks clear criteria for determining the legality of employer monitoring methods. An analysis of ECHR case law, enforcement practices and European Union legislation suggests at least the following criteria for assessing the legitimacy of employer monitoring: 1) legitimacy of the monitoring purpose; 2) suitability of the chosen means to achieve the monitoring objectives; 3) use of the least intrusive monitoring methods; 4) employee notification regarding the purposes, methods, and means of monitoring. These criteria can be applied in enforcement practice and further improvements to Russian labor legislation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Actual Problems of Russian Law
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2025.175.6.111-118
Primary Topic
Legal and Policy Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Limits of Employer Authority in the Digital Age: Monitoring Employee’s Duties Performance

A. V. Menkenov
Actual Problems of Russian Law
Legal and Policy Issues
article

The Limits of Employer Authority in the Digital Age: Monitoring Employee’s Duties Performance

A. V. Menkenov
article en

Abstract

By virtue of the legal nature of the employment relationship, the employer possesses managerial authority, which includes the right to monitor employees’ performance of their job duties. Digitalization provides employers with new technologies for real-time monitoring (cameras, GPS trackers, biometric scanning, etc.). These technologies may lead to violations of privacy rights. Russian legislation lacks clear criteria for determining the legality of employer monitoring methods. An analysis of ECHR case law, enforcement practices and European Union legislation suggests at least the following criteria for assessing the legitimacy of employer monitoring: 1) legitimacy of the monitoring purpose; 2) suitability of the chosen means to achieve the monitoring objectives; 3) use of the least intrusive monitoring methods; 4) employee notification regarding the purposes, methods, and means of monitoring. These criteria can be applied in enforcement practice and further improvements to Russian labor legislation.

Actual Problems of Russian LawVol. 20(6)
The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RU)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Legal and Policy Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Limits of Employer Authority in the Digital Age: Monitoring Employee’s Duties Performance — A. V. Menkenov · Actual Problems of Russian Law (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS