Access to Expert Opinions for the Accused and Defense Counsel in Russian Criminal Proceedings: Gaps in Law and Judicial Practice Conflicts

Russian criminal procedure law does not explicitly require investigators to promptly disclose expert opinions to the suspect (accused) and their defense counsel upon receipt. At the same time, the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation lacks provisions allowing restrictions on the defense’s right to access such expert opinions. Both the defense and the prosecution may abuse their rights. The author argues that any restriction on the right of the accused to access an expert opinion should be permissible only by court order under Article 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. It is also necessary to provide guarantees to the defense to become familiar with the expert’s opinion as part of the preliminary investigation. The paper proposes amending Article 206 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation by introducing a new Part 3, which would permit restricting the accused and his defense attorney’s access to expert opinion solely by judicial authorization. The said court decision could set a specific timeframe for familiarization with the expert’s opinion, provided justified grounds exist.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Actual Problems of Russian Law
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2025.175.6.137-147
Primary Topic
Deception detection and forensic psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Access to Expert Opinions for the Accused and Defense Counsel in Russian Criminal Proceedings: Gaps in Law and Judicial Practice Conflicts

А. А. Хайдаров
Actual Problems of Russian Law
Deception detection and forensic psychology
article

Access to Expert Opinions for the Accused and Defense Counsel in Russian Criminal Proceedings: Gaps in Law and Judicial Practice Conflicts

А. А. Хайдаров
article en

Abstract

Russian criminal procedure law does not explicitly require investigators to promptly disclose expert opinions to the suspect (accused) and their defense counsel upon receipt. At the same time, the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation lacks provisions allowing restrictions on the defense’s right to access such expert opinions. Both the defense and the prosecution may abuse their rights. The author argues that any restriction on the right of the accused to access an expert opinion should be permissible only by court order under Article 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. It is also necessary to provide guarantees to the defense to become familiar with the expert’s opinion as part of the preliminary investigation. The paper proposes amending Article 206 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation by introducing a new Part 3, which would permit restricting the accused and his defense attorney’s access to expert opinion solely by judicial authorization. The said court decision could set a specific timeframe for familiarization with the expert’s opinion, provided justified grounds exist.

Actual Problems of Russian LawVol. 20(6)
Kazan Federal University (RU), Naberezhnye Chelny State Pedagogical Institute (RU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Deception detection and forensic psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Access to Expert Opinions for the Accused and Defense Counsel in Russian Criminal Proceedings: Gaps in Law and Judicial Practice Conflicts — А. А. Хайдаров · Actual Problems of Russian Law (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS