Criteria for the Emergence of Co-Authorship in the Creation of Works Using Generative Artificial Intelligence

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is developing both qualitatively and quantitatively, offering new opportunities for creating various works, literary texts, images, musical compositions and even videos. Providing access to these creative tools raises new legal issues related to copyright protection of works generated by AI. Questions also arise regarding the distribution of copyright between individuals who are one way or another involved in the creation of such works, that is, in situations of co-authorship. A clear understanding of the concept of «creativity» in relation to AI-generated works is necessary, along with an analysis of the criteria for co-authorship between users and AI developers. The paper examines doctrinal and legislative approaches to the concept of «creativity» and attempts to justify the circumstances under which copyright protection should be granted to AI-generated works. The author explores different scenarios for granting copyright protection depending on the circumstances of a work’s creation. The author seeks to define what constitutes generative AI as opposed to the broader concept of artificial intelligence. In addressing this issue, the author also presents arguments against recognizing AI as an author of a work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Actual Problems of Russian Law
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2025.175.6.097-110
Primary Topic
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Criteria for the Emergence of Co-Authorship in the Creation of Works Using Generative Artificial Intelligence

R. M. Kantemirov
Actual Problems of Russian Law
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
article

Criteria for the Emergence of Co-Authorship in the Creation of Works Using Generative Artificial Intelligence

R. M. Kantemirov
article en

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is developing both qualitatively and quantitatively, offering new opportunities for creating various works, literary texts, images, musical compositions and even videos. Providing access to these creative tools raises new legal issues related to copyright protection of works generated by AI. Questions also arise regarding the distribution of copyright between individuals who are one way or another involved in the creation of such works, that is, in situations of co-authorship. A clear understanding of the concept of «creativity» in relation to AI-generated works is necessary, along with an analysis of the criteria for co-authorship between users and AI developers. The paper examines doctrinal and legislative approaches to the concept of «creativity» and attempts to justify the circumstances under which copyright protection should be granted to AI-generated works. The author explores different scenarios for granting copyright protection depending on the circumstances of a work’s creation. The author seeks to define what constitutes generative AI as opposed to the broader concept of artificial intelligence. In addressing this issue, the author also presents arguments against recognizing AI as an author of a work.

Actual Problems of Russian LawVol. 20(6)
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (RU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.