Inactivity of the Participants in Evidence Presentation as a Form of Lawful Procedural Conduct in Civil Cases

The paper demonstrates theoretical and practical significance of inactivity of trial participants involved in providing evidence in civil procedure. The relevance of the issue is predetermined by the fact that in the legal periodicals there is an increase in the number of proposals to impose fines on persons participating in the trial, if they demonstrate procedural inactivity in civil cases dealt with in courts of general jurisdiction, since, in their opinion, inactivity reduces the effectiveness of the trial. However, as the author shows, the problem lies in a more harmonious implementation of the principles of adversarial civil proceedings, primarily the disposition principle, in court’s practice. The paper provides judicial practice demonstrating the variety of procedural situations related to the legal consequences of the procedural inactivity of the parties. The author refers to judicial statistics, which also does not confirm the relevance of proposals for the introduction of fines for persons involved in the case. The author concludes that it is necessary to preserve the current legal regime of adversarial and dispositive civil proceedings, which allows for the procedural inactivity of the participants involved in the procedure of providing evidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Actual Problems of Russian Law
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2025.175.6.064-074
Primary Topic
Legal and Policy Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inactivity of the Participants in Evidence Presentation as a Form of Lawful Procedural Conduct in Civil Cases

E. G. Tombulova
Actual Problems of Russian Law
Legal and Policy Issues
article

Inactivity of the Participants in Evidence Presentation as a Form of Lawful Procedural Conduct in Civil Cases

E. G. Tombulova
article en

Abstract

The paper demonstrates theoretical and practical significance of inactivity of trial participants involved in providing evidence in civil procedure. The relevance of the issue is predetermined by the fact that in the legal periodicals there is an increase in the number of proposals to impose fines on persons participating in the trial, if they demonstrate procedural inactivity in civil cases dealt with in courts of general jurisdiction, since, in their opinion, inactivity reduces the effectiveness of the trial. However, as the author shows, the problem lies in a more harmonious implementation of the principles of adversarial civil proceedings, primarily the disposition principle, in court’s practice. The paper provides judicial practice demonstrating the variety of procedural situations related to the legal consequences of the procedural inactivity of the parties. The author refers to judicial statistics, which also does not confirm the relevance of proposals for the introduction of fines for persons involved in the case. The author concludes that it is necessary to preserve the current legal regime of adversarial and dispositive civil proceedings, which allows for the procedural inactivity of the participants involved in the procedure of providing evidence.

Actual Problems of Russian LawVol. 20(6)
Russian University of Cooperation (RU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Legal and Policy Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.