Forms of Personalness and the Practice of Deinstitutionalisation in the Hungarian Child Protection System

The present study examines the problem of implementing ‘personalness’ (i.e. direct, interpersonal contact in a family-like environment) in the upbringing of children who are not raised or educated within their families in Hungary. The desired outcome of deinstitutionalisation and its implications in the field of children’s rights are examined. The study presents the ways in which Hungarian regulations seek to address this desired outcome; it also discusses some shortcomings and proposes potential improvements to increase the likelihood that children in various forms of state care experience personalness.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Legal Studies
Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47745/ausleg.2024.13.1.10
Primary Topic
Legal Rights and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Forms of Personalness and the Practice of Deinstitutionalisation in the Hungarian Child Protection System

Felícia Laura Sváb-Repponi
1 links
Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Legal Studies
Legal Rights and Human Rights
article

Forms of Personalness and the Practice of Deinstitutionalisation in the Hungarian Child Protection System

Felícia Laura Sváb-Repponi
article en

Abstract

The present study examines the problem of implementing ‘personalness’ (i.e. direct, interpersonal contact in a family-like environment) in the upbringing of children who are not raised or educated within their families in Hungary. The desired outcome of deinstitutionalisation and its implications in the field of children’s rights are examined. The study presents the ways in which Hungarian regulations seek to address this desired outcome; it also discusses some shortcomings and proposes potential improvements to increase the likelihood that children in various forms of state care experience personalness.

Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Legal StudiesVol. 13(1)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Legal Rights and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.