ASSESSING THE USEFULNESS OF SIMPLIFIED PROJECT MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORKS IN A SMALL ENTERPRISE CONTEXT

Purpose: The study aims to evaluate the applicability and perceived usefulness of a light weight project management methodology tailored for small-scale projects, particularly within environments with limited project management experience and resources. Design/methodology/approach: An experimental research design involving multiple student led teams executing real-world small projects over four months was employed. The methodology under evaluation was systematically applied by each team, supported by trained mentors. Data were collected through structured surveys assessing various dimensions of the methodology’s practicality and effectiveness, including documentation, role clarity, stakeholder engagement, and risk management. Findings: The findings indicate that simplified project management approaches can effectively support small project environments. Respondents reported high satisfaction levels with the ease of use, clarity of documentation, and effectiveness of core tools such as role assignment mechanisms, project boards, and deliverables mapping. The methodology also demonstrated utility in enhancing stakeholder communication and managing evolving project requirements. Minor challenges were observed, primarily related to stakeholder engagement variance and unforeseen risks. Research limitations/implications: The study’s limitations include student teams in an academic setting, not fully reflecting commercial pressures or dynamics. Mentor involvement may have inflated performance, limiting findings’ generalizability and needing further research. Practical implications: The study suggests that small enterprises and nonprofit organisations can benefit from adopting streamlined methods that emphasise clarity, frequent feedback, and simple documentation. Originality/value: This study contributes to the limited empirical literature on project management in small-scale and resource-constrained environments. It provides evidence-based insights into minimalist project management methodologies' practical benefits and limitations, offering value for researchers, practitioners, and educators seeking adaptive, accessible tools for managing small projects in SMEs, NGOs, and student settings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology Organization and Management Series
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2025.224.34
Primary Topic
Construction Project Management and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ASSESSING THE USEFULNESS OF SIMPLIFIED PROJECT MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORKS IN A SMALL ENTERPRISE CONTEXT

Małgorzata Zakrzewska, Sławomir Wawak
Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology Organization and Management Series
Construction Project Management and Performance
article

ASSESSING THE USEFULNESS OF SIMPLIFIED PROJECT MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORKS IN A SMALL ENTERPRISE CONTEXT

Małgorzata Zakrzewska, Sławomir Wawak
article en

Abstract

Purpose: The study aims to evaluate the applicability and perceived usefulness of a light weight project management methodology tailored for small-scale projects, particularly within environments with limited project management experience and resources. Design/methodology/approach: An experimental research design involving multiple student led teams executing real-world small projects over four months was employed. The methodology under evaluation was systematically applied by each team, supported by trained mentors. Data were collected through structured surveys assessing various dimensions of the methodology’s practicality and effectiveness, including documentation, role clarity, stakeholder engagement, and risk management. Findings: The findings indicate that simplified project management approaches can effectively support small project environments. Respondents reported high satisfaction levels with the ease of use, clarity of documentation, and effectiveness of core tools such as role assignment mechanisms, project boards, and deliverables mapping. The methodology also demonstrated utility in enhancing stakeholder communication and managing evolving project requirements. Minor challenges were observed, primarily related to stakeholder engagement variance and unforeseen risks. Research limitations/implications: The study’s limitations include student teams in an academic setting, not fully reflecting commercial pressures or dynamics. Mentor involvement may have inflated performance, limiting findings’ generalizability and needing further research. Practical implications: The study suggests that small enterprises and nonprofit organisations can benefit from adopting streamlined methods that emphasise clarity, frequent feedback, and simple documentation. Originality/value: This study contributes to the limited empirical literature on project management in small-scale and resource-constrained environments. It provides evidence-based insights into minimalist project management methodologies' practical benefits and limitations, offering value for researchers, practitioners, and educators seeking adaptive, accessible tools for managing small projects in SMEs, NGOs, and student settings.

Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology Organization and Management SeriesVol. 2025(224)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Construction Project Management and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.