Good Boundaries? Growing Multispecies Cultures on the Family Farm

Abstract This paper considers the practical application of the metaphor of “good boundaries” for working towards better interspecies relationships and multispecies cultures. Engaged philosophical methods are employed in the context of the author’s family farm with attentiveness towards both multispecies and colonial politics. The analysis centers interspecies relational dynamics across a spectrum of liminal forms of life on “the property,” in the “homestead,” and under the guise of “stewardship.” The paper concludes that the metaphor of good boundaries helps to generate better multispecies entanglements by (i) growing our capacity for ecological thinking, (ii) directing our attention to moral failure, and, at times, (iii) disrupting anthropocentric colonial ideologies and practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hypatia
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/hyp.2025.10020
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geographies of human-animal interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Good Boundaries? Growing Multispecies Cultures on the Family Farm

Julia D. Gibson
1 citations
Hypatia
Geographies of human-animal interactions
6.72
article

Good Boundaries? Growing Multispecies Cultures on the Family Farm

Julia D. Gibson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper considers the practical application of the metaphor of “good boundaries” for working towards better interspecies relationships and multispecies cultures. Engaged philosophical methods are employed in the context of the author’s family farm with attentiveness towards both multispecies and colonial politics. The analysis centers interspecies relational dynamics across a spectrum of liminal forms of life on “the property,” in the “homestead,” and under the guise of “stewardship.” The paper concludes that the metaphor of good boundaries helps to generate better multispecies entanglements by (i) growing our capacity for ecological thinking, (ii) directing our attention to moral failure, and, at times, (iii) disrupting anthropocentric colonial ideologies and practices.

HypatiaVol. 40(4)
Antioch University New England (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Geographies of human-animal interactions
6.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.