Técnica y fin de la historia: el cuestionamiento a la neutralidad moral de los aparatos técnicos en la filosofía de Günther Anders

It is commonly held that technology is morally neutral and that the evaluation should be applied exclusively to the purposes of those who use that means. This research revolves around the question of the moral neutrality of technology in the work of Günther Anders. In this regard, the philosopher enriches and, to a certain extent, corrects the assertion of this supposed neutrality by arguing that technology, at least that which emerged after the industrial revolutions, carries with it a direction that seeks to impose itself on any human criteria and direction and, for this reason, attempts to steer history with its sole impersonal objectives of growth and expansion. This direction is already an intentionality that challenges that neutrality. Moreover, this technical tutelage deprives the individual of the possibilities to create their own history and to be accountable for it, but, even more gravely, it advances towards a complete disregard for humanity and, ultimately, towards its annihilation. The answer to this question will allow us to understand the diagnoses and prognoses of Andersian philosophy of technology and the alternative courses of action that still appear in his work for a human, rational, free, and fraternal orientation of history.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Universitas Philosophica
Published
2024-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11144/javeriana.uph41-83.tfha
Primary Topic
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Técnica y fin de la historia: el cuestionamiento a la neutralidad moral de los aparatos técnicos en la filosofía de Günther Anders

Andrea Báez-Alarcón, David Solís Nova
Universitas Philosophica
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
article

Técnica y fin de la historia: el cuestionamiento a la neutralidad moral de los aparatos técnicos en la filosofía de Günther Anders

Andrea Báez-Alarcón, David Solís Nova
article en

Abstract

It is commonly held that technology is morally neutral and that the evaluation should be applied exclusively to the purposes of those who use that means. This research revolves around the question of the moral neutrality of technology in the work of Günther Anders. In this regard, the philosopher enriches and, to a certain extent, corrects the assertion of this supposed neutrality by arguing that technology, at least that which emerged after the industrial revolutions, carries with it a direction that seeks to impose itself on any human criteria and direction and, for this reason, attempts to steer history with its sole impersonal objectives of growth and expansion. This direction is already an intentionality that challenges that neutrality. Moreover, this technical tutelage deprives the individual of the possibilities to create their own history and to be accountable for it, but, even more gravely, it advances towards a complete disregard for humanity and, ultimately, towards its annihilation. The answer to this question will allow us to understand the diagnoses and prognoses of Andersian philosophy of technology and the alternative courses of action that still appear in his work for a human, rational, free, and fraternal orientation of history.

Universitas PhilosophicaVol. 41(83)
Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción (CL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.