Life cycle assessment of raw beef meat production in Argentina: from farm to butcher shop

This study conducted a life cycle assessment for Argentinian beef meat across its entire production chain. Based on this analysis, a complete inventory was developed, and the environmental profile of Argentine beef was characterized by applying a harmonized impact assessment methodology and a wide range of impact categories. The primary stages considered were rearing, finishing, slaughter, and selling and two different finishing ways were included: traditional extensive and supplemented. global warming potential (GWP), stratospheric ozone depletion (SOD), freshwater and terrestrial ecotoxicity (FWEc and TEc), freshwater eutrophication (FWEu), terrestrial acidification (TA), fossil resource scarcity (FRS), mineral resource scarcity (MRS), water consumption (WC) and land use (LU) were the evaluated impacts. The rearing and slaughter phases had the most significant burden in inventory calculations. The rearing and finishing phases were the major contributors to GWP, SOD, FWEu, TA, and LU. Seeds and agrochemical production had a considerable burden on FWEc, TEc, and WC. Enteric fermentation produced about 50% of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions while those from the loss of soil organic carbon and residues and renewal from pasture cultivation were also remarkable. While supplementing livestock with high-quality feed reduces GHG emissions, other impacts such as FWEc, TEc, TA, FRS, MRS, and WC are increased up to 30%. Moreover, industrial phases should be included within the LCA scope due to their significant impact on the inventory. This comprehensive analysis provides a tool for comparing the environmental profiles of beef with other protein sources, ensuring a more accurate representation of the overall effects of beef production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EUREKA Life Sciences
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21303/2504-5695.2025.003880
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Life cycle assessment of raw beef meat production in Argentina: from farm to butcher shop

Silvina Cecilia Andrés, Nadia Florencia Nagai, Gabriel Lorenzo, Germán García Colli et al.
EUREKA Life Sciences
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

Life cycle assessment of raw beef meat production in Argentina: from farm to butcher shop

Silvina Cecilia Andrés, Nadia Florencia Nagai, Gabriel Lorenzo, Germán García Colli, M. G. Torres
article en

Abstract

This study conducted a life cycle assessment for Argentinian beef meat across its entire production chain. Based on this analysis, a complete inventory was developed, and the environmental profile of Argentine beef was characterized by applying a harmonized impact assessment methodology and a wide range of impact categories. The primary stages considered were rearing, finishing, slaughter, and selling and two different finishing ways were included: traditional extensive and supplemented. global warming potential (GWP), stratospheric ozone depletion (SOD), freshwater and terrestrial ecotoxicity (FWEc and TEc), freshwater eutrophication (FWEu), terrestrial acidification (TA), fossil resource scarcity (FRS), mineral resource scarcity (MRS), water consumption (WC) and land use (LU) were the evaluated impacts. The rearing and slaughter phases had the most significant burden in inventory calculations. The rearing and finishing phases were the major contributors to GWP, SOD, FWEu, TA, and LU. Seeds and agrochemical production had a considerable burden on FWEc, TEc, and WC. Enteric fermentation produced about 50% of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions while those from the loss of soil organic carbon and residues and renewal from pasture cultivation were also remarkable. While supplementing livestock with high-quality feed reduces GHG emissions, other impacts such as FWEc, TEc, TA, FRS, MRS, and WC are increased up to 30%. Moreover, industrial phases should be included within the LCA scope due to their significant impact on the inventory. This comprehensive analysis provides a tool for comparing the environmental profiles of beef with other protein sources, ensuring a more accurate representation of the overall effects of beef production.

EUREKA Life Sciences(2)
Institute of Food Science & Technology (GB), Universidad Nacional de La Plata (AR)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.