Procedure for selecting use case-specific sustainability indicators in manufacturing systems

The manufacturing industry faces increasing pressure to minimize its environmental impact while maintaining economic viability. Sustainability assessments are essential for determining the environmental impact, yet numerous existing assessment systems primarily focus on external reporting and do not consider use case-specific factors such as the company size. Furthermore, only a limited number of assessment systems address different levels of manufacturing systems, such as the factory level or the manufacturing line. This makes it challenging for companies to identify indicators that can be applied to a company-specific use case. This contribution presents a user-friendly procedure to support industry practitioners with selecting appropriate indicators. The procedure is supported with an indicator catalog consisting of 477 environmental and economic sustain-ability indicators and a selection guideline. The application is demonstrated through an exemplary use case. Finally, future research opportunities are proposed, such as integrating indicators that address the social dimension of sustainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Procedia CIRP
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2025.04.001
Primary Topic
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Procedure for selecting use case-specific sustainability indicators in manufacturing systems

S. L. Keil, Patrick W. Jordan, Daniel Schneider, Michael F. Zaeh et al.
Procedia CIRP
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
article

Procedure for selecting use case-specific sustainability indicators in manufacturing systems

S. L. Keil, Patrick W. Jordan, Daniel Schneider, Michael F. Zaeh, Susanne Vernim, Lasse Streibel
article en

Abstract

The manufacturing industry faces increasing pressure to minimize its environmental impact while maintaining economic viability. Sustainability assessments are essential for determining the environmental impact, yet numerous existing assessment systems primarily focus on external reporting and do not consider use case-specific factors such as the company size. Furthermore, only a limited number of assessment systems address different levels of manufacturing systems, such as the factory level or the manufacturing line. This makes it challenging for companies to identify indicators that can be applied to a company-specific use case. This contribution presents a user-friendly procedure to support industry practitioners with selecting appropriate indicators. The procedure is supported with an indicator catalog consisting of 477 environmental and economic sustain-ability indicators and a selection guideline. The application is demonstrated through an exemplary use case. Finally, future research opportunities are proposed, such as integrating indicators that address the social dimension of sustainability.

Procedia CIRPVol. 135
Technical University of Munich (DE)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.