LCA comparison of freestanding kitchens adopting three technologies: electric, gas and induction

Household appliances are no longer a luxury but a need in every household. The excessive use of the devices has led researchers to focus on their influence on the environment. This paper investigates the life cycle performances of three different types of freestanding kitchens used in Europe with different hob technologies (electric, gas and induction) using the Life Cycle Assessment method. The work provided data collected (Life Cycle Inventory) for each model of the freestanding kitchens manufactured in the European market. The functional unit used for the comparison of the three types of freestanding is “ the amount of energy used to make 2 meals a day for a year ”. To evaluate the environmental impact of the appliances a dedicated software was used (i.e., SimaPro). A comparison between the environmental impact results allows the users to choose the most sustainable appliance in accordance with their need. Focusing on Global Warming Potential impact, the ranges adopted induction hob shows a higher impact results during the raw Materials and Manufacturing phase compared to the other ranges. On one hand, the environmental impact results from cradle to gate concerning the raw materials extraction and manufacturing process show that the most critical aspect is related to the use of metals in large parts such as the cavity and structure of the products. On the other hand, the environmental impact regarding the use phase shows different results depending on the source of energy in the country where the freestanding kitchen is used. The outcome of this work can be a reference to enhance the sustainability of these products in the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Procedia CIRP
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2024.12.010
Primary Topic
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

LCA comparison of freestanding kitchens adopting three technologies: electric, gas and induction

Claudio Favi, Sarra Brahem
Procedia CIRP
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
article

LCA comparison of freestanding kitchens adopting three technologies: electric, gas and induction

Claudio Favi, Sarra Brahem
article en

Abstract

Household appliances are no longer a luxury but a need in every household. The excessive use of the devices has led researchers to focus on their influence on the environment. This paper investigates the life cycle performances of three different types of freestanding kitchens used in Europe with different hob technologies (electric, gas and induction) using the Life Cycle Assessment method. The work provided data collected (Life Cycle Inventory) for each model of the freestanding kitchens manufactured in the European market. The functional unit used for the comparison of the three types of freestanding is “ the amount of energy used to make 2 meals a day for a year ”. To evaluate the environmental impact of the appliances a dedicated software was used (i.e., SimaPro). A comparison between the environmental impact results allows the users to choose the most sustainable appliance in accordance with their need. Focusing on Global Warming Potential impact, the ranges adopted induction hob shows a higher impact results during the raw Materials and Manufacturing phase compared to the other ranges. On one hand, the environmental impact results from cradle to gate concerning the raw materials extraction and manufacturing process show that the most critical aspect is related to the use of metals in large parts such as the cavity and structure of the products. On the other hand, the environmental impact regarding the use phase shows different results depending on the source of energy in the country where the freestanding kitchen is used. The outcome of this work can be a reference to enhance the sustainability of these products in the future.

Procedia CIRPVol. 135
University of Parma (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.