Sustainable Sourcing with Spatial Life Cycle Assessment

This study introduces a Spatial Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) framework that enhances conventional LCA to support sustainable sourcing decisions. By integrating geospatial data and network mapping techniques, the method tracks the origins and propagation of environmental impacts across the life cycle. A case study on lithium extraction from Nevada clay deposits demonstrates the framework’s application, analyzing impacts across various environmental categories. The results highlight significant regional differences, with over 90% of land and water use impacts concentrated on-site in Nevada, and 70% of freshwater ecotoxicity impacts in Arizona. By mapping upstream and downstream impacts with geospatial detail, the framework provides organizations with a clearer understanding of where impacts occur, enabling more informed sourcing decisions. Future improvements will refine the location selection, labeling, and mapping processes to simplify sourcing decisions based on sustainability goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Procedia CIRP
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2024.12.132
Primary Topic
Sustainable Industrial Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sustainable Sourcing with Spatial Life Cycle Assessment

Sameer G. Kulkarni, Fu Zhao, Venkat Roy
Procedia CIRP
Sustainable Industrial Ecology
article

Sustainable Sourcing with Spatial Life Cycle Assessment

Sameer G. Kulkarni, Fu Zhao, Venkat Roy
article en

Abstract

This study introduces a Spatial Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) framework that enhances conventional LCA to support sustainable sourcing decisions. By integrating geospatial data and network mapping techniques, the method tracks the origins and propagation of environmental impacts across the life cycle. A case study on lithium extraction from Nevada clay deposits demonstrates the framework’s application, analyzing impacts across various environmental categories. The results highlight significant regional differences, with over 90% of land and water use impacts concentrated on-site in Nevada, and 70% of freshwater ecotoxicity impacts in Arizona. By mapping upstream and downstream impacts with geospatial detail, the framework provides organizations with a clearer understanding of where impacts occur, enabling more informed sourcing decisions. Future improvements will refine the location selection, labeling, and mapping processes to simplify sourcing decisions based on sustainability goals.

Procedia CIRPVol. 135
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Office of Energy Efficiency
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Sustainable Industrial Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.