Financing agroecological transformations for territorial agri-food systems: Beyond the myth of financial scarcity

Today’s industrial agri-food system has significant negative impacts on the environment and society, including biodiversity loss, freshwater pollution and consumption, and contributing nearly 40% of all greenhouse gas emissions. Agroecology offers an alternative paradigm for agriculture and food systems. Diverse agroecological practices seek to imitate the structure and function of natural ecosystems and build socio-ecological resilience at different scales. The UN Food and Agriculture Organization and the International Panel on Climate Change both endorse the benefits and huge potential of agroecology for mitigating and adapting to climate change. But the most recent estimates show that transforming global agri-food systems toward more nutritious, inclusive, and net-zero models could cost up to USD 500 billion per year. The mainstream view is that public financial resources are not sufficient to transform agri-food systems for sustainability and that private finance is therefore essential to fill the funding gap. However, evidence presented in this paper debunks this deeply ingrained myth of financial scarcity. It identifies an abundance of public and private money potentially available to transform agri-food systems for climate repair and biodiversity conservation, and help achieve other goals, such as poverty alleviation, responsible consumption and production, reduced inequities, and food security. Accessing this finance will involve (i) redirecting finance, subsidies, and research away from industrial agri-food systems and greenwashing toward re-localized agri-food systems based on short food chains and circular degrowth metabolisms; (ii) using taxation to access hitherto untapped sources of finance and discourage destructive systems; and (iii) financing inclusive and participatory democracy to counteract the power of wealthy elites at this critical moment in history. The paper concludes by calling on agroecology practitioners to defy disciplinary boundaries and obedient knowledge, and develop new social norms and transformative visions for finance outside of capitalism, colonialism, and patriarchy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Elementa Science of the Anthropocene
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2025.00026
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.66
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Financing agroecological transformations for territorial agri-food systems: Beyond the myth of financial scarcity

Michel Pimbert
2 citations
Elementa Science of the Anthropocene
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
9.66
article

Financing agroecological transformations for territorial agri-food systems: Beyond the myth of financial scarcity

Michel Pimbert
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Today’s industrial agri-food system has significant negative impacts on the environment and society, including biodiversity loss, freshwater pollution and consumption, and contributing nearly 40% of all greenhouse gas emissions. Agroecology offers an alternative paradigm for agriculture and food systems. Diverse agroecological practices seek to imitate the structure and function of natural ecosystems and build socio-ecological resilience at different scales. The UN Food and Agriculture Organization and the International Panel on Climate Change both endorse the benefits and huge potential of agroecology for mitigating and adapting to climate change. But the most recent estimates show that transforming global agri-food systems toward more nutritious, inclusive, and net-zero models could cost up to USD 500 billion per year. The mainstream view is that public financial resources are not sufficient to transform agri-food systems for sustainability and that private finance is therefore essential to fill the funding gap. However, evidence presented in this paper debunks this deeply ingrained myth of financial scarcity. It identifies an abundance of public and private money potentially available to transform agri-food systems for climate repair and biodiversity conservation, and help achieve other goals, such as poverty alleviation, responsible consumption and production, reduced inequities, and food security. Accessing this finance will involve (i) redirecting finance, subsidies, and research away from industrial agri-food systems and greenwashing toward re-localized agri-food systems based on short food chains and circular degrowth metabolisms; (ii) using taxation to access hitherto untapped sources of finance and discourage destructive systems; and (iii) financing inclusive and participatory democracy to counteract the power of wealthy elites at this critical moment in history. The paper concludes by calling on agroecology practitioners to defy disciplinary boundaries and obedient knowledge, and develop new social norms and transformative visions for finance outside of capitalism, colonialism, and patriarchy.

Elementa Science of the AnthropoceneVol. 13(1)
Coventry University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
9.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.