EFL Students’ Perspectives as Peer Reviewers in Virtual Writing Contexts: A Case Study in Indonesian Higher Education

The studies of peer review in EFL composition class have received considerable attention in the literature. However, little understanding of how students as reviewers perceived peer review in a virtual learning environment as part of remote assessment. Due to the expansion of technology and the implementation of hybrid learning, language instructions were shifted from an on-site (face-to-face) learning mode into a blended learning system, including language assessment activities. Although existing research on peer review has been extensive, peer review from a peer reviewer perpectives in the virtual setting is still infrequent. This research aims to investigate EFL students' perspectives as peer reviewers in virtual writing contexts in Indonesian Higher Education. The current study was conducted in an exploratory case study approach. The participants were 41 students. The instruments were open-ended questionnaires and in-depth interviews. In addition, the comment analysis from the peer reviewers was investigated from the rubric of the peer review form. The findings revealed that almost all the peer reviewers voiced positive repertoires regarding the experiences in peer review in a virtual learning environment, and the comment analysis found mostly in the micro and macro meanings and strength comments as the crucial parts in delivering review to the peer reviewees’ artefacts. The findings revealed that almost all the peer reviewers voiced positive repertoires regarding the experiences in peer review in a virtual learning environment, and the comment analysis found mostly the micro and macro meanings and strength comments as the crucial parts in delivering review to the peer reviewees’ artefacts. The current study implies sharing recommendations for implementing peer review in the virtual writing context with proper preparation before the realization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Languages and Language Teaching
Published
2025-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v13i3.14891
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EFL Students’ Perspectives as Peer Reviewers in Virtual Writing Contexts: A Case Study in Indonesian Higher Education

Rifari Baron, Sri Arfani, Hanna Sundari, Rina Husnaini Febriyanti et al.
Journal of Languages and Language Teaching
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

EFL Students’ Perspectives as Peer Reviewers in Virtual Writing Contexts: A Case Study in Indonesian Higher Education

Rifari Baron, Sri Arfani, Hanna Sundari, Rina Husnaini Febriyanti, Arif Rahman
article en

Abstract

The studies of peer review in EFL composition class have received considerable attention in the literature. However, little understanding of how students as reviewers perceived peer review in a virtual learning environment as part of remote assessment. Due to the expansion of technology and the implementation of hybrid learning, language instructions were shifted from an on-site (face-to-face) learning mode into a blended learning system, including language assessment activities. Although existing research on peer review has been extensive, peer review from a peer reviewer perpectives in the virtual setting is still infrequent. This research aims to investigate EFL students' perspectives as peer reviewers in virtual writing contexts in Indonesian Higher Education. The current study was conducted in an exploratory case study approach. The participants were 41 students. The instruments were open-ended questionnaires and in-depth interviews. In addition, the comment analysis from the peer reviewers was investigated from the rubric of the peer review form. The findings revealed that almost all the peer reviewers voiced positive repertoires regarding the experiences in peer review in a virtual learning environment, and the comment analysis found mostly in the micro and macro meanings and strength comments as the crucial parts in delivering review to the peer reviewees’ artefacts. The findings revealed that almost all the peer reviewers voiced positive repertoires regarding the experiences in peer review in a virtual learning environment, and the comment analysis found mostly the micro and macro meanings and strength comments as the crucial parts in delivering review to the peer reviewees’ artefacts. The current study implies sharing recommendations for implementing peer review in the virtual writing context with proper preparation before the realization.

Journal of Languages and Language TeachingVol. 13(3)
Universitas Indraprasta PGRI (ID)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.