Social Media-Driven Polarisation in the United States: Mechanisms, Policy Gaps, and Recommendations

Currently, political polarisation in the United States has reached crisis levels, posing a threat to the integrity of its long-standing democratic system. Yet many remain unaware of the role social media platforms play in influencing this division through algorithmic curation and misinformation. On the user level, social media platforms exploit vulnerabilities such as media illiteracy and perceived anonymity to drive engagement for their own economic incentive. Current policies, including Section 230 reforms and state-wide initiatives, show promise but are misdirected in addressing the underlying mechanisms on social media that propagate polarisation. This paper examines the glaring policy gap surrounding social media regulation and its lackluster effects on curbing polarising content on platforms. In response, this paper evaluates alternative policy models outside the United States to propose a comprehensive set of policy recommendations tailored to today's context. Together, this paper aims to dissect and raise awareness of media-driven polarisation to safeguard democracy and social cohesion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Humanities and Social Science
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14445/23942703/ijhss-v12i3p106
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social Media-Driven Polarisation in the United States: Mechanisms, Policy Gaps, and Recommendations

Aashima Arora
International Journal of Humanities and Social Science
Social Media and Politics
article

Social Media-Driven Polarisation in the United States: Mechanisms, Policy Gaps, and Recommendations

Aashima Arora
article en

Abstract

Currently, political polarisation in the United States has reached crisis levels, posing a threat to the integrity of its long-standing democratic system. Yet many remain unaware of the role social media platforms play in influencing this division through algorithmic curation and misinformation. On the user level, social media platforms exploit vulnerabilities such as media illiteracy and perceived anonymity to drive engagement for their own economic incentive. Current policies, including Section 230 reforms and state-wide initiatives, show promise but are misdirected in addressing the underlying mechanisms on social media that propagate polarisation. This paper examines the glaring policy gap surrounding social media regulation and its lackluster effects on curbing polarising content on platforms. In response, this paper evaluates alternative policy models outside the United States to propose a comprehensive set of policy recommendations tailored to today's context. Together, this paper aims to dissect and raise awareness of media-driven polarisation to safeguard democracy and social cohesion.

International Journal of Humanities and Social ScienceVol. 12(3)
United World College of South East Asia (SG)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.