Ready or not? Psychologists’ perceptions of work readiness in the age of AI

The Fourth Industrial Revolution, driven by rapid AI advancements, presents significant challenges and opportunities for psychologists. As these dynamics evolve, it is crucial to prepare practitioners adequately, yet current accreditation frameworks seem insufficient. This qualitative study explored work readiness (WR) perceptions among fully registered psychologists in Australia within this shifting technological landscape. Semi-structured interviews with six participants, analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and a social constructionist approach, revealed three themes: (1) Human-Centric WR Skills Are Irreplaceable by AI, (2) AI Will Enhance Psychological Practice, and (3) Education Must Adapt to Emphasise AI-Integration and Human-Centric Qualities. The study identifies a critical gap between current accreditation, which often prioritises technical skills, and the humanistic capacities valued by psychologists. These findings advocate for a re-evaluation of psychology’s accreditation pathway, promoting a more holistic approach to preparing future psychologists for an AI-integrated profession. This research contributes foundational insights to the discourse on WR in psychology, emphasising the balance between technological proficiency and essential human skills in navigating AI integration. It also encourages dialogue between accreditation bodies and psychologists to reconcile differing WR perspectives and ensure the future preparedness of practitioners.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Computer Science
Published
2025-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2025.1524024
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ready or not? Psychologists’ perceptions of work readiness in the age of AI

Ashleigh Schweinsberg, Colleen McDonald
2 citations
Frontiers in Computer Science
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
5.53
article

Ready or not? Psychologists’ perceptions of work readiness in the age of AI

Ashleigh Schweinsberg, Colleen McDonald
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The Fourth Industrial Revolution, driven by rapid AI advancements, presents significant challenges and opportunities for psychologists. As these dynamics evolve, it is crucial to prepare practitioners adequately, yet current accreditation frameworks seem insufficient. This qualitative study explored work readiness (WR) perceptions among fully registered psychologists in Australia within this shifting technological landscape. Semi-structured interviews with six participants, analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and a social constructionist approach, revealed three themes: (1) Human-Centric WR Skills Are Irreplaceable by AI, (2) AI Will Enhance Psychological Practice, and (3) Education Must Adapt to Emphasise AI-Integration and Human-Centric Qualities. The study identifies a critical gap between current accreditation, which often prioritises technical skills, and the humanistic capacities valued by psychologists. These findings advocate for a re-evaluation of psychology’s accreditation pathway, promoting a more holistic approach to preparing future psychologists for an AI-integrated profession. This research contributes foundational insights to the discourse on WR in psychology, emphasising the balance between technological proficiency and essential human skills in navigating AI integration. It also encourages dialogue between accreditation bodies and psychologists to reconcile differing WR perspectives and ensure the future preparedness of practitioners.

Frontiers in Computer ScienceVol. 7
Hologic (Germany) (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
5.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.