Submarine Return Electrodes vs. Dedicated Metallic Returns: A Comparative Cost/Benefit Analysis

High Voltage Direct Current transmission systems have become increasingly strategic for the efficient and reliable transfer of electrical power over long distances, particularly in submarine applications. The use of return electrodes in HVDC systems can be a valuable choice for providing a low-resistance current path both in Monopolar and Bipolar links, taking advantage of seawater as conductive medium. This solution is generally more cost-effective and has lower electrical losses compared to Dedicated Metallic Return conductors. The purpose of this paper is to provide a comparative cost analysis between a system with submarine electrodes and the same one with a dedicated metallic return. It seeks to identify the break-even point at which submarine electrodes become more advantageous than dedicated metallic returns for a typical 1 GW HVDC submarine link. Additionally, it compares the costs associated with electrical losses between the two solutions both for Bipolar and Monopolar links. Eventually, the paper provides an overview of the potential impact of an offshore electrode on the environment and metallic infrastructure and how it can be mitigated through a scrupulous design and careful site selection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/aeithvdc66044.2025.11079483
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Submarine Return Electrodes vs. Dedicated Metallic Returns: A Comparative Cost/Benefit Analysis

M. Nervi, Davide Pietribiasi, Marco Cuzzocrea
1 citations
Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
0.80
article

Submarine Return Electrodes vs. Dedicated Metallic Returns: A Comparative Cost/Benefit Analysis

M. Nervi, Davide Pietribiasi, Marco Cuzzocrea
article en
1 citations

Abstract

High Voltage Direct Current transmission systems have become increasingly strategic for the efficient and reliable transfer of electrical power over long distances, particularly in submarine applications. The use of return electrodes in HVDC systems can be a valuable choice for providing a low-resistance current path both in Monopolar and Bipolar links, taking advantage of seawater as conductive medium. This solution is generally more cost-effective and has lower electrical losses compared to Dedicated Metallic Return conductors. The purpose of this paper is to provide a comparative cost analysis between a system with submarine electrodes and the same one with a dedicated metallic return. It seeks to identify the break-even point at which submarine electrodes become more advantageous than dedicated metallic returns for a typical 1 GW HVDC submarine link. Additionally, it compares the costs associated with electrical losses between the two solutions both for Bipolar and Monopolar links. Eventually, the paper provides an overview of the potential impact of an offshore electrode on the environment and metallic infrastructure and how it can be mitigated through a scrupulous design and careful site selection.

Prysmian Group (Italy) (IT), Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Genova (IT), University of Genoa (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Submarine Return Electrodes vs. Dedicated Metallic Returns: A Comparative Cost/Benefit Analysis — M. Nervi, Davide Pietribiasi, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS